2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.245430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing nitrogen dopant atoms in graphene using atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This substantial variation of the pattern from one experiment to the next was further illustrated by van der Heijden et al by combining STM and atomic force microscopy (AFM) ( Fig. 6) [52] : although the defect appears asymmetric in the STM image and is different from other reports (cf. e.g.…”
Section: Stm Imaging and Electronic Doping From Sts Spectramentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This substantial variation of the pattern from one experiment to the next was further illustrated by van der Heijden et al by combining STM and atomic force microscopy (AFM) ( Fig. 6) [52] : although the defect appears asymmetric in the STM image and is different from other reports (cf. e.g.…”
Section: Stm Imaging and Electronic Doping From Sts Spectramentioning
confidence: 62%
“…[56] On the other hand, DFT-based models have often demonstrated to successfully corroborate probe microscopy measurements on graphene, even when involving complex tip functionalizations or inelastic effects. [75][76][77][78] This is due to an accurate description of tip structure and orbital symmetries, as well as charge and potential variations in the sampled regions.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DFT-NEGF calculations of STM on almost isolated defects are problematic both due to periodic repetition of the surface unit-cell, including the repetition of the STM probe tips. Here a calculation of the transmission from an "STM"-like tip to graphene [32][33][34][35][36] is calculated via two methods. Namely, a three terminal (left/right graphene/tip) invoking transverse periodicity, and a two terminal (graphene/tip) calculation, both at an applied bias of µ graphene − µ tip = −0.5 eV.…”
Section: Stm Tip On Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%