2022
DOI: 10.1080/00318884.2021.2006589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing novel cyanobacterial diversity in marine benthic mats, with the description of Sirenicapillariaceaefam. nov., two new genera,Sirenicapillaria gen. nov. andTigrinifilum gen. nov., and seven new species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These benthic species typically possess gas vesicles, and they are capable of nitrogen fixation, resembling the notoriously reported planktic oceanic nitrogen fixer Trichodesmium, which also clusters in this group. We have noticed two recent reports published after our phylogenetic trees for the current article were already finished, including the description of new families of marine benthic cyanobacteria, Vermifilaceae and Sirenicapillariaceae (Berthold et al 2021(Berthold et al , 2022. The new families in these studies were based exclusively on 16S rRNA gene data and seemed to be intermixed with Microcoleaceae as defined in our current study (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These benthic species typically possess gas vesicles, and they are capable of nitrogen fixation, resembling the notoriously reported planktic oceanic nitrogen fixer Trichodesmium, which also clusters in this group. We have noticed two recent reports published after our phylogenetic trees for the current article were already finished, including the description of new families of marine benthic cyanobacteria, Vermifilaceae and Sirenicapillariaceae (Berthold et al 2021(Berthold et al , 2022. The new families in these studies were based exclusively on 16S rRNA gene data and seemed to be intermixed with Microcoleaceae as defined in our current study (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…We have noticed two recent reports published after our phylogenetic trees for the current article were already finished, including the description of new families of marine benthic cyanobacteria, Vermifilaceae and Sirenicapillariaceae (Berthold et al. 2021, 2022). The new families in these studies were based exclusively on 16S rRNA gene data and seemed to be intermixed with Microcoleaceae as defined in our current study (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Application of 16S rRNA gene phylogenies has resulted in hundreds of new taxa being described in the last two decades, either as novel taxa or revising previously polyphyletic taxa (Komárek et al, 2014;Mai et al, 2018). While much effort has focused on revising the genus and species ranks, orders and families have recently received more attention (Berthold et al, 2021(Berthold et al, , 2022Komárek et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2018) as many of the current ranks were artifacts of morphology-based taxonomy. Several works (e.g., Berthold et al, 2021Berthold et al, , 2022Bonthond et al, 2021;Mareš, 2018;Sendall & McGregor, 2018), noted the polyphyletic nature of these ranks using both 16S rRNA gene and phylogenomic analyses.…”
Section: E T H O D S a R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much effort has focused on revising the genus and species ranks, orders and families have recently received more attention (Berthold et al, 2021(Berthold et al, , 2022Komárek et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2018) as many of the current ranks were artifacts of morphology-based taxonomy. Several works (e.g., Berthold et al, 2021Berthold et al, , 2022Bonthond et al, 2021;Mareš, 2018;Sendall & McGregor, 2018), noted the polyphyletic nature of these ranks using both 16S rRNA gene and phylogenomic analyses. Recently, Strunecký et al (2022) revised the cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic analyses, enhancing our understanding and resolving the polyphyly of these ranks.…”
Section: E T H O D S a R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Активне застосування комплексного підходу з широким залученням молекулярнофілогенетичних даних, розроблення нової класифікаційної схеми, покликаної відобразити еволюційну історію групи, спираючись на монофілетичні таксони ціанобактерій (Komárek et al, 2014), спричинило глибокі зміни в їхній систематиці. Щороку описують десятки нових родів і видів, з'являються й зникають нові родини та порядки (Komárkova et al, 2013;Hauer et al, 2014;Moreira et al, 2017;Mai et al, 2018;Komárek et al, 2020;Johansen et al, 2021;Pietrasiak et al, 2021;Bertold et al, 2022;Cheng et al, 2022). Крім того, протягом останніх 20 років українські альгологи активно продовжували флористичні та таксономічні дослідження, у т. ч. із залученням молекулярних методів, значно розширивши список видів ціанобактерій і таксономічну структуру флори (Kostikov, Golub, 2007;Sadogurskaya, 2007;Vinogradova, Darienko, 2008;Kovalenko, 2009;Nesterova, 2010;Vinogradova, Mikhailiuk, 2010;Gerasimiuk, 2011;Yarmoshenko et al, 2012;Voitsekhovich, 2013;Mikhailiuk et al, 2016Mikhailiuk et al, , 2018Vinogradova, 2016а;Beresovska, 2017;Vinogradova et al, 2017;Romanenko et al, 2020;Mikhailiuk, Vinogradova, 2022).…”
Section: вступunclassified