2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.03.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing spontaneous micro-expression from eye region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with previous studies, as shown in Table 6, Duan also stated where the eye area was the most influential in each expression [28]. Wen-Jiang Yan's research, which uses FACS observations or based on AU movements, also states that the eye area also affects the expression of disgust and shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared with previous studies, as shown in Table 6, Duan also stated where the eye area was the most influential in each expression [28]. Wen-Jiang Yan's research, which uses FACS observations or based on AU movements, also states that the eye area also affects the expression of disgust and shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The observations are particularly prioritized on the eyes area and additionally the mouth area. Region-based research better results than global-based research (full-face observation) [28]. The motion features obtained from all areas of the facial components are used for the micro-expression classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, there are several parts which could be used to enhance the performance of micro-expression recognition. Firstly, MEs are not distributed uniformly across the whole face [22]- [25], and they occur in a combination of several facial regions. For example, the muscular movements of the cheek lift and mouth upturn show a happy emotion, while the raised eyebrows and slightly parted lips indicate that someone feels surprised; Secondly, when using different feature descriptors to extract the block features, the dimension of the feature vectors will increase exponentially with the increase of parameters.…”
Section: Although Ekman and His Team Developed Micro Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For addressing the problem of MER, many approaches including conventional and deep methods have been developed to model the fleeting subtle changes of spontaneous microexpressions towards the individual-database task. The conventional methods [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] usually extract handcrafted features, e.g., local binary patterns on three orthogonal planes (LBP-TOP) [5], [8], second-order Gaussian jet on LBP-TOP [6], LBP six intersection points (LBP-SIP) [7], local spatiotemporal directional features (LSDF) [10], spatiotemporal LBP (STLBP) [9], spatiotemporal completed local quantization patterns (STCLQP) [12], discriminative spatiotemporal LBP (DSLBP) [16], directional mean optical-flow (MDMO) [14], bi-weighted oriented optical flow (Bi-WOOF) [17] and fuzzy histogram of optical flow orientation (FHOFO) [18], and then construct a classifier, e.g., support vector machine (SVM) [5], [11], [9], [12], [17] and random forest (RF) [5], [8], [13], [15], specially for MER. Although these handcrafted features continue to improve the representation ability for MER, it is still difficult to manually design good representations for capturing quick subtle changes of micro-expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%