2022
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11091500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Students and Detecting Student Engagement with Real-Time Image Processing

Abstract: With COVID-19, formal education was interrupted in all countries and the importance of distance learning has increased. It is possible to teach any lesson with various communication tools but it is difficult to know how far this lesson reaches to the students. In this study, it is aimed to monitor the students in a classroom or in front of the computer with a camera in real time, recognizing their faces, their head poses, and scoring their distraction to detect student engagement based on their head poses and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the complexity of an actual classroom, we introduced the power IoU loss function in YOLOv5 to detect the students and obtain a precision of 95.4% Ashwin et al [21] proposed an unobtrusive engagement recognition method using nonverbal cues that obtained 71% accuracy, and our proposed bimodal learning engagement method obtained 93.94% accuracy on the KNN classifier. Uçar et al [36] presented a model to predict students' engagement in the classroom from Kinect facial and head poses. However, the range of Kinect is small and cannot be used in a large-scale classroom.…”
Section: The Results Of Decision Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the complexity of an actual classroom, we introduced the power IoU loss function in YOLOv5 to detect the students and obtain a precision of 95.4% Ashwin et al [21] proposed an unobtrusive engagement recognition method using nonverbal cues that obtained 71% accuracy, and our proposed bimodal learning engagement method obtained 93.94% accuracy on the KNN classifier. Uçar et al [36] presented a model to predict students' engagement in the classroom from Kinect facial and head poses. However, the range of Kinect is small and cannot be used in a large-scale classroom.…”
Section: The Results Of Decision Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology support mainly includes the development of learning content to instruct learning, the creation of learning environments to involve learning, the design of platforms and tools to improve learning, and the organization and standardization of learning resources to make learning content reusable and more formal. However, in a report by Affordable Colleges Online (AC Online), it is mentioned that having an educational setting through virtual technologies, students often face common distractions, such as social networks, text messages, notifications, or the presence of other people who speak or ask questions; DeCandia and Colleagues [4, 24] used a webcam to recognize students' faces, head postures, and distraction levels to assess student interest. Using the UPNA Head Pose Database, the Local Binary Patterns technique to achieve face recognition and head position estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also defined as "the value that a participant in an interaction attributes to the goal of being together with the other participant(s) and of continuing the interaction" [14]. Estimating the value of engagement plays a vital role across various domains including education [18], healthcare [6] and UX optimization [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%