2004
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing the Centrality of Gender Identity and Stereotype Knowledge in Gender Development and Moving Toward Theoretical Integration: Reply to Bandura and Bussey (2004).

Abstract: Most of the critique in the A. Bandura and K. Bussey (see record 2004-18097-001) commentary is a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the points made by C. L. Martin, D. N. Ruble, and J. Szkrybalo in their 2002 Psychological Bulletin article (see record 2002-18663-003). First, Martin et al. never intended to present a comprehensive theory; instead, it was a review of 2 different cognitive approaches to gender development. Second, there is no time line test that has been failed; instead, gender cognitions m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be that these aspects of gender identity are core aspects of children’s gender development (Egan & Perry, 2001) that develop independently of parental influence. Cognitive development theorists argue that children integrate information about their gender from their wider social environment: they actively construct for themselves what it means to be a boy or a girl (Martin et al, 2004), and it seems that these processes develop independently of the family environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It might be that these aspects of gender identity are core aspects of children’s gender development (Egan & Perry, 2001) that develop independently of parental influence. Cognitive development theorists argue that children integrate information about their gender from their wider social environment: they actively construct for themselves what it means to be a boy or a girl (Martin et al, 2004), and it seems that these processes develop independently of the family environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this theory, gender schemas (organized knowledge and beliefs about gender in the wider social environment) play an important role in gender development and children have an active role in acquiring these gender schemas (Martin, 2000). Children integrate information about their gender from their wider social environment, especially their peers, and actively construct for themselves, based on this information, what it means to be a boy or a girl (Maccoby 1998; Martin, Ruble, & Szykrybalo, 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence needed to resolve this controversy concerns whether behavior becomes increasingly gender typed with the onset of basic gender understanding, and recent findings have extended our knowledge of these fundamental issues. Much has been written about these topics and about the surrounding controversies (Bandura & Bussey 2004; Martin et al 2002, 2004); here, we provide an overview and update of the evidence.…”
Section: How Early Do Children Acquire Gender Concepts and Exhibit Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two differ greatly in the significance attributed to early representations of gender categories (Perry et al, 1984). According to self socialization views, a milestone in gender development is children’s understanding that there are two gender categories and that they themselves belong to one of these categories: an achievement termed basic gender identity or self-labeling (Martin, Ruble, & Szkrybalo, 2004). According to this perspective, basic gender identity motivates and directs the development of sex-typed behaviors.…”
Section: Competing Theoretical Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 99%