2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant Human-C1 Inhibitor Is Effective and Safe for Repeat Hereditary Angioedema Attacks

Abstract: A single 50-IU/kg dose rhC1INH was effective for improving symptoms of an HAE attack with sustained efficacy for treatment of subsequent attacks. rhC1INH had a positive safety profile throughout the study. This study supports repeated use of rhC1INH over time in patients with HAE attacks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…rhC1‐INH is licensed by the FDA and EMA for the acute treatment of C1‐INH‐HAE for the patients aged 13 and older 96, 109. An open‐label treatment study with rhC1‐INH in a pediatric population (2–13 years) is ongoing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rhC1‐INH is licensed by the FDA and EMA for the acute treatment of C1‐INH‐HAE for the patients aged 13 and older 96, 109. An open‐label treatment study with rhC1‐INH in a pediatric population (2–13 years) is ongoing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy was maintained with treatment of subsequent attacks in the Open Label Extension phases [67][68][69][70]. No relapse or rebound episodes were reported for Ruconest, suggesting that its mechanism of action and PD properties, rather than its relatively short half-life, lead to sustained plasma activity.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The efficacy of Ruconest for the treatment of C1-INH-HAE patients experiencing acute angioedema attacks has been demonstrated in several studies, including three double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy studies where patients were treated for a single C1-INH-HAE attack [33,35] and five open-label studies where patients could be treated for multiple attacks (Table 4) [67][68][69][70]74].…”
Section: Attack Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No relationship between anti-C1-INH antibody presence and rhC1-INH efficacy was observed. The open-label extension study evaluating the efficacy and safety of rhC1INH (50 IU/kg) for the treatment of multiple HAE attacks detected no discontinuation due to adverse events, no thrombotic or anaphylactic events, and no generation of neutralizing anti-C1INH antibodies [34]. Being rhC1INH purified from milk of transgenic rabbits, Hack et al conducted a retrospective analysis of the frequency and clinical relevance of pre-exposure and potentially newly induced, Immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies against rabbit and other animal allergens including cow's milk by the Immuno-CAP Specific IgE blood test system.…”
Section: Immunogenicitymentioning
confidence: 99%