2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombination-dependent concatemeric viral DNA replication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mounting evidence indicates that viruses exploit the cellular DNA damage response in order to facilitate the replication of their own genetic material (22,23), and recombination-dependent replication has been previously described as a viable and efficient method for production for some virus types (24). In fact, DNA viruses such as simian virus 40 (SV40) (25), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) (26-28), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (29,30), and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) (31) have exhibited the use of replication-associated recombination in the synthesis of their genomes during infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mounting evidence indicates that viruses exploit the cellular DNA damage response in order to facilitate the replication of their own genetic material (22,23), and recombination-dependent replication has been previously described as a viable and efficient method for production for some virus types (24). In fact, DNA viruses such as simian virus 40 (SV40) (25), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) (26-28), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (29,30), and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) (31) have exhibited the use of replication-associated recombination in the synthesis of their genomes during infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tailed dsDNA bacteriophages and herpesviruses, the newly synthesized viral DNA in host cells exists as tandem concatemers, each composed of multiple copies of unit-length genome (6,7). The viral DNA-packaging motor (also known as terminase large subunit or large terminase) cleaves concatemeric viral DNA into units of or near the genomic length and pumps each into a preformed capsid precursor termed procapsid powered by ATP hydrolysis (2,6,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results obtained with E. coli enzymes, it is believed that bacterial HJ resolvases work in concert with RuvAB. However, recent data from other bacteria suggest that the in vivo role of ubiquitous HJ translocases (RecG and RuvAB) might not be conserved: (i) the absence of both branch migration translocases, RecG and RuvAB, is synthetically lethal in B. subtilis (Firmicutes phylum) or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (representative of ␤-Proteobacteria class) (24 -26); (ii) ruvAB and recG show a synergistic defect in DNA repair in E. coli cells (␥-Proteobacteria class); (iii) recG suppresses the recombination defect of the ruvB mutations in Helicobacter pylori (representative of ⑀-Proteobacteria Class) (27); (iv) ruvAB is synthetically lethal in the recU context (24); (v) the resolvases from phages or Archaea seem to act independently of the presence of a branch migration helicase (6,12,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%