2019
DOI: 10.25674/so91iss3pp73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for establishing global collaborative networks in soil ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We only found one study carried out in the polar zone. The same geographical bias was already pointed out by other global studies on soil biodiversity (Phillips et al, 2019;Beaumelle et al, 2021;Guerra et al, 2021), recognized as a problem to be overcome (Ramirez et al, 2018), and it is seen as a reflection of social, political, and economic inequalities among countries (Maestre and Eisenhauer, 2019). Forests, croplands and grasslands were the most represented ecosystems (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Where?geographical Biases Of Soil Phenology Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We only found one study carried out in the polar zone. The same geographical bias was already pointed out by other global studies on soil biodiversity (Phillips et al, 2019;Beaumelle et al, 2021;Guerra et al, 2021), recognized as a problem to be overcome (Ramirez et al, 2018), and it is seen as a reflection of social, political, and economic inequalities among countries (Maestre and Eisenhauer, 2019). Forests, croplands and grasslands were the most represented ecosystems (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Where?geographical Biases Of Soil Phenology Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Another opportunity to balance research inequalities between the Global North and South is by creating global networks in which scientists share funding and staff (Maestre and Eisenhauer, 2019). Given the high number and/or high quality of both phenological and soil networks worldwide, it does not seem to be necessary to create a new collaborative network focused on soil phenology.…”
Section: Gaps Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only found one study carried out in the polar zone, besides its high seasonality and high importance from the climate change perspective. The same geographical bias was already pointed out by other global studies on soil biodiversity (Beaumelle et al, 2021 ; Guerra et al, 2021 ; Phillips et al, 2019 ), recognized as a problem to be overcome (Ramirez et al, 2018 ), and it is seen as a reflection of social, political, and economic inequalities among countries (Maestre & Eisenhauer, 2019 ).…”
Section: Current Knowledge Of Soil Phenologysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Another opportunity to balance research inequalities between the Global North and South is by creating global networks in which scientists share funding and staff (Maestre & Eisenhauer, 2019 ). However, given the high number and/or high quality of both phenological and soil networks worldwide, creating a collaborative network focused on soil phenology does not seem to be necessary.…”
Section: Gaps Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the number of participating regions, all with their unique combination of climatic conditions and anthropogenic pressures, would further increase the potential to draw general conclusions about the interacting effects of climate change and roads as anthropogenic disturbance on mountain plant communities (Guo et al, 2018 ). This is particularly important for regions currently under‐represented by the existing MIREN survey sites (Figure 4 ), such as Africa, Eastern Asia, and central America, regions for which long‐term biodiversity data are often lacking (Maestre & Eisenhauer, 2019 ). Despite these spatial gaps, MIREN has already more than doubled in size on its road to becoming a global‐scale network since it was first established in eight regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%