Recommendations for ethnic equity in health: A Delphi study from Denmark

Abstract

Aims A key issue in public health is how to approach ethnic inequities. Despite an increased focus on the health of people from ethnic minorities in the last 15 years, significant ethnic health inequities still exist in Denmark. These arise during pregnancy and are exacerbated by higher rates of exposure to health risks during the life course. This study aimed to formulate recommendations on both structural and organisational levels to reduce ethnic health inequities. Methods Nine decision-makers – representing municipalities, regions, the private sector and voluntary organisations in Denmark – participated in the formulation of recommendations inspired by the Delphi method. The consensus process was conducted in three rounds during spring 2020, resulting in eight overall recommendations, including suggestions for action. Results The recommendations address both structural and organisational levels. They aim to strengthen: 1) health policies and strategies related to the needs of people from ethnic minorities, including health literacy, linguistic, cultural and social differences; 2) health-promoting local initiatives developed in co-creation with people from ethnic minorities; 3) health promotion and prevention from a life course perspective with a focus on early intervention; 4) cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary collaborations that facilitate transitions and coordination; 5) competencies of professionals in terms of cultural knowledge, awareness, reflexivity and skills; 6) access to healthcare services by increasing information and resources; 7) interpreting assistance for, and linguistic accessibility to, healthcare services; 8) documentation and intervention research. Conclusions To reduce ethnic health inequities, it is crucial that Danish welfare institutions, including their strategies, approaches and skills of employees, are adapted to serve an increasingly heterogeneous population.

Tackling physical inactivity in Scandinavia: a narrative review of reviews supplemented by expert interviews

“…Based on our narrative review results, we argue that PI among ethnic minorities should have special attention, as this group diverges from other inactive groups by having other barriers towards PA [9, 12]. Ethnic minorities and the distinctive barriers related to these groups are important to consider in relation to PI, but we should also acknowledge the numerous subgroups within ethnic minorities if interventions are to be successful [39]. It is furthermore noticeable that several of these potential barriers are not related to the individuals themselves, but to more social, normative or societal issues [9, 12].…”

“…For instance, Danish sports clubs compared to their European counterparts have remarkably few offers focusing on ethnic minorities’ needs [40]. More focus on ethnic minorities’ possibilities for health-promoting activities are needed in Denmark [39] as well as in other Scandinavian countries.…”

Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers

“…Situated within RRI, which centres co-creation of research agenda and contents to ensure that research and innovation are responsive to the needs and values of society and produce societally good outcomes [85][86][87][88][89], our CCMD approach was fully co-creative and reflected now established approaches, beginning with an open-ended survey to gather recommendations from our multi-stakeholder group (similar to the approaches taken in [90][91][92][93]), and progressing as a continually co-created, iterative, consensus-driven process until the recommendations were finalized over the course of eight phases, organized as follows: In what follows, we describe the components and process of our CCMD method and describe each phase in detail, as illustrated in figure 1. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. Soc.…”

The Culturally Competent Healthcare Professional: The RESPECT Competencies from a Systematic Review of Delphi Studies

“…Experts clarified the content of the knowledge that healthcare professionals should have to work effectively with diverse populations. The most dominant content related to social determinants of health, social and cultural factors influencing health, and knowledge of the various cultures [16,17,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Other studies highlighted the importance of having knowledge of more aspects.…”

“…Five studies discussed the need for healthcare professionals to learn from their patients [2,9,10,28,36]. However, experts from twelve studies reached a consensus on other competencies that were required for learning from patients and valuing their patients' perspectives.…”