2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
632
0
18

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,603 publications
(656 citation statements)
references
References 257 publications
6
632
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Definite and borderline RHD were further classified into WHF sub-categories (A–C borderline, A–D definite) 9 . Mitral and aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis were classified as trivial (only regurgitation), mild, moderate, or severe according to published standards 31, 32 . Children with definite RHD were classified by severity of regurgitation at the most affected valve (mild, moderate, severe), or severe if any mitral stenosis was present at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definite and borderline RHD were further classified into WHF sub-categories (A–C borderline, A–D definite) 9 . Mitral and aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis were classified as trivial (only regurgitation), mild, moderate, or severe according to published standards 31, 32 . Children with definite RHD were classified by severity of regurgitation at the most affected valve (mild, moderate, severe), or severe if any mitral stenosis was present at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that RA/RV/inferior vena cava enlargement can occur in other conditions and can be normal in acute, severe TR. 44 TR assessment was by color flow Doppler and hepatic vein flow reversal, which can be less reliable in assessing TR grade in severe disease. The study established associations, but cause and effect cannot be implicated for altered anatomy.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition applies in both primary and secondary MR and is endorsed by the AHA/ACC 9. Moderate MR is defined as an RF between 30% and 50%, with moderate to severe taken as an RF between 40% and 50% 14. This latter term is often used in published studies of secondary MR, but it is seldom defined in specific terms.…”
Section: Quantification Of Secondary Mrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In secondary MR, this is largely a consequence of the fact that the orifice shape is non-circular with an oval or crescent shape. Indeed, the current ASE guidelines indicate that PISA definitions of severity in secondary MR are ‘problematic’ 14. Cardiac MRI may be the most reliable method to evaluate MR (vide infra), but this method needs further study in patients with secondary MR.…”
Section: Quantification Of Secondary Mrmentioning
confidence: 99%