Recommendations for the Design and Implementation of Virtual Reality for Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Systematic Review (Preprint)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly being used for the assessment and treatment of impairments arising from acquired brain injuries (ABIs) due to perceived benefits over traditional methods. However, no tailored options exist for the design and implementation of VR for ABI rehabilitation and, more specifically, traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. In addition, the evidence base lacks systematic reviews of immersive VR use for TBI rehabilitation. Recommendations for this population are important because of the many complex and diverse impairments that individuals can experience. OBJECTIVE This study aims to conduct a two-part systematic review to identify and synthesize existing recommendations for designing and implementing therapeutic VR for ABI rehabilitation, including TBI, and to identify current evidence for using immersive VR for TBI assessment and treatment and to map the degree to which this literature includes recommendations for VR design and implementation. METHODS This review was guided by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). A comprehensive search of 11 databases and gray literature was conducted in August 2019 and repeated in June 2020. Studies were included if they met relevant search terms, were peer-reviewed, were written in English, and were published between 2009 and 2020. Studies were reviewed to determine the level of evidence and methodological quality. For the first part, qualitative data were synthesized and categorized via meta-synthesis. For the second part, findings were analyzed and synthesized descriptively owing to the heterogeneity of data extracted from the included studies. RESULTS In the first part, a total of 14 papers met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations for VR design and implementation were not specific to TBI but rather to stroke or ABI rehabilitation more broadly. The synthesis and analysis of data resulted in three key phases and nine categories of recommendations for designing and implementing VR for ABI rehabilitation. In the second part, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2 studies reported on VR for assessment and three for treatment. Studies were varied in terms of therapeutic targets, VR tasks, and outcome measures. VR was used to assess or treat impairments in cognition, balance, and anxiety, with positive outcomes. However, the levels of evidence, methodological quality, and inclusion of recommendations for VR design and implementation were poor. CONCLUSIONS There is limited research on the use of immersive VR for TBI rehabilitation. Few studies have been conducted, and there is limited inclusion of recommendations for therapeutic VR design and implementation. Future research in ABI rehabilitation should consider a stepwise approach to VR development, from early co-design studies with end users to larger controlled trials. A list of recommendations is offered to provide guidance and a more consistent model to advance clinical research in this area. CLINICALTRIAL

Interactions with virtual therapists during motor rehabilitation in immersive virtual environments: a systematic review

“…For instance, qualitative studies could explore the subjective experiences of patients and therapists, including their perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using VTs. The selected studies use a variety of methods in collating users experience, but as highlighted by Brassel et al (2021), it is important that future research into ABI rehabilitation should consider a stepwise approach to VR development, utilising co-design studies with end users to larger controlled trials. These approaches, along with surveys and interviews could be used to gather data on both patient and therapists experience, providing a rich source of information to improve VT systems.…”

Impact of task constraints on a 3D visuomotor tracking task in virtual reality

“…It is therefore possible that a small portion of the errors in the depth dimension may be attributed to the vergence/accommodation conflict inherent in virtual reality headsets. Therefore, as discussed by Brassel et al (2021), further efforts are required in order to make virtual environments more realistic, thus improving the performances of participants.…”

A machine learning approach to evaluate the impact of virtual balance/cognitive training on fall risk in older women

“…This is more often experienced by immersive VE participants, and very rarely by nonimmersive VR users (Venkatakrishnan et al, 2023;Sokołowska, 2024). Despite these (a) unfavorable effects (Drazich et al, 2023;Dopsaj et al, 2024), but also (b) the lack of standardization of virtual tools/environments (Kourtesis et al, 2021;Porffy et al, 2022;Kim et al, 2023;Holmqvist et al, 2024), (c) researching to prepare recommendations for the use of VR in specific patient populations (Juras et al, 2019;Brassel et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Rodríguez-Almagro et al, 2024), (d) discussing emerging user data protection/privacy issues and ethical dilemmas (Segkouli et al, 2023;Goldstein et al, 2024;Rudschies and Schneider, 2024), researchers and clinicians/physiotherapists highlight the enormous potential of innovative technologies (Jonson et al, 2021;Bateni et al, 2024;Moulaei et al, 2024). Today's societies are aging at a very rapid pace, which necessitates measures to support the elderly in preventing falls and their serious consequences, including exercising cognitive function in progressive senile dementia (Barbaccia et al, 2022;Yang J. G. et al, 2022;Buele et al, 2023;Ren et al, 2024;Siette et al, 2024;Tortora et al, 2024;Wilf et al, 2024) -these actions are the future of modern clinical practice in (neuro)geriatrics.…”