2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for the Use of Parenteral Methotrexate in Rheumatic Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, MTX po might be recommended because it is the drug for which most evidence is available due to its lower price (cost-effectiveness). However, it is important to remember that the bioavailability of parenteral MTX is higher than that of MTX po, particularly at doses of ≥15 mg/week [ 54 , 55 ], and that in patients with an inadequate response to orally administered MTX (15 mg/week), dose scaling using parenteral MTX is more clinically effective [ 55 , 56 ]. Likewise, we should always consider patient opinion and preference when making therapeutic decisions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, MTX po might be recommended because it is the drug for which most evidence is available due to its lower price (cost-effectiveness). However, it is important to remember that the bioavailability of parenteral MTX is higher than that of MTX po, particularly at doses of ≥15 mg/week [ 54 , 55 ], and that in patients with an inadequate response to orally administered MTX (15 mg/week), dose scaling using parenteral MTX is more clinically effective [ 55 , 56 ]. Likewise, we should always consider patient opinion and preference when making therapeutic decisions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point to note is that recommendations include the use of MTX po (vs. MTX sc) in combination with bDMARD, both because more evidence is available and due to cost. However, the option of MTX sc should be evaluated case by case since its bioavailability is greater and the patient may prefer this route of administration [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides functional limitations, participants could have preconceived negative feelings toward injectable MTX (affective attitude), which could increase avoidance behaviors towards MTX injection (56). It is important for health care professionals to counter any myth or misconception that MTX injection is only used for treatment of cancer (60) while discussing with their patients that there is good rationale for using parenteral MTX, such as easing the burden on patients who have swallowing difficulties (61).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В рекомендациях Европейского альянса ревматологических ассоциаций (EULAR, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) [7,[16][17][18][19][20], Американской коллегии ревматологов (ACR, American College of Rheumatology) [16-18, 21, 22], Азиатско-Тихоокеанской лиги ассоциаций ревматологов (APLAR, Asia Pacifi c League of Associations for Rheumatology) [23], национальных ассоциаций ревматологов [17,18,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] и Ассоциации ревматологов России (АРР) [16,36,37] МТ рассматривается как препарат «выбора» для индукции и поддержания ремиссии у пациентов с ранним и развернутым РА, в том числе нуждающихся в проведении комбинированной терапии МТ с глюкокортикоидами (ГК), стандартными (с) БПВП, ГИБП и тБПВП. После постановки диагноза РА лечение МТ следует начинать как можно раньше [19].…”
Section: рекомендацииunclassified