2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommended best practices for collecting, analyzing, and reporting microplastics in environmental media: Lessons learned from comprehensive monitoring of San Francisco Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual identification of microplastics followed the definitions of previous studies (e.g. De Witte et al, 2014;MERI, 2017;Hurley et al, 2018;Miller et al, 2021). A particle was identified as microplastic, if (1) it had no visible organic structures even under high magnification; (2) had homogenous colour; and (3) reacted to the hot needle test.…”
Section: Laboratory Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The visual identification of microplastics followed the definitions of previous studies (e.g. De Witte et al, 2014;MERI, 2017;Hurley et al, 2018;Miller et al, 2021). A particle was identified as microplastic, if (1) it had no visible organic structures even under high magnification; (2) had homogenous colour; and (3) reacted to the hot needle test.…”
Section: Laboratory Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several authors highlighted the importance of contamination prevention and quality control in microplastic research (e.g. Miller et al, 2021;Pérez-Guevara et al, 2021). Throughout the sample collection and laboratory work, metal and glass equipment and non-synthetic clothing were used to avoid contamination.…”
Section: Contamination Prevention and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All microparticles included in polymer analysis were confirmed to be anthropogenic in either origin or processing (Figure 7 and Supporting Information, Table S2). Processed microparticles accounted for 80% of the subsample analyzed and included non-synthetic material (e.g., forms of cellulose that originated from a plant; Miller et al, 2021) that had been isolated and had undergone human processing including the addition of additives or dyes. Examples of cellulose categorized as processed include paper products (e.g., plastic-lined cups) or plant-based fabrics (e.g., linen, wool, and cotton).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need to standardized practices and enforce strong quality assurance and control measures to allow data to be reproducible and comparable across aquatic systems. Many authors have recommended guidelines and best practices to improve initial study design and ensure a minimum standard quality for microplastic data (Twiss 2016, Connors et al 2017, Hung et al 2020, and Miller et al 2021. Cowger et al (2020) compiled a checklist of elements for researchers to provide comparable information.…”
Section: Toward Standard Practices and Biomonitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%