1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(97)01112-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital ‘Utstein style’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this lack of a standardised approach to reporting is a problem, and is in marked contrast to the approach recommended for other aspects of resuscitation reporting. 41 We are now in an era of intervention in resuscitation research and of financial frugality more generally, thus such a standardised approach, which might include data designed to inform a health economic evaluation, is urgently needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this lack of a standardised approach to reporting is a problem, and is in marked contrast to the approach recommended for other aspects of resuscitation reporting. 41 We are now in an era of intervention in resuscitation research and of financial frugality more generally, thus such a standardised approach, which might include data designed to inform a health economic evaluation, is urgently needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommends documenting the CPC at discharge from hospital, 6 months and 1 year post cardiac arrest (for those that survive to discharge) 41 ; it makes no further recommendation regarding detailed QoL assessments in these patients. The 'Cerebral Performance Category' is a very gross functional score, but is very easy and simple to use and obtain and undoubtedly provides some useful information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A data-gathering form, based on the Utstein model, 8,9 was com- For the primary aim of this study, the frequency of cardiac arrest was defined as the number of occurrences of this adverse event divided by the total number of anesthetic procedures performed in the hospital over the period considered. From the anesthesia records and the data-gathering form, the causes of cardiac arrest and death were retrospectively assigned by three of the present authors as one of the following: entirely related to anesthesia when anesthesia was the only or the major contributory factor; partially related to anesthesia when the patient's disease/condition or the surgical procedure was a contributory factor, but anesthesia represented an additional factor; entirely related to surgery; or entirely related to the patient's disease/condition.…”
Section: Intervention and Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is limited by the fact we were not able to provide data of the resuscitation process and the cause of cardiac arrest according to Utstein criteria [28], because the ASDI database was not conducted as a cardiac-arrest registry. Conversely, the size of the database allowed detailed comparisons of in-hospital treatment factors in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%