2015 International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies (ICT 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2015.0243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommender System with Formal Concept Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TFCC algorithm was compared with the work APG (Zhang et al , 2015) which used the statistical properties of Gibbs Sampling for solving the matrix completion problem. Though the APG was able to reconstruct the original matrix, it was suitable when experimented with the extremely large and sparse data matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TFCC algorithm was compared with the work APG (Zhang et al , 2015) which used the statistical properties of Gibbs Sampling for solving the matrix completion problem. Though the APG was able to reconstruct the original matrix, it was suitable when experimented with the extremely large and sparse data matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2015) have proposed an accelerated proximal gradient algorithm (APG), which aims at solving large-scale randomly-generated matrix with ε -optimal solution. This APG algorithm, with a fast method called PROPACK, was used to compute the matrix decomposition which aims at solving the matrix completion problems with low-rank solution matrix.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work proposed by Nobahari [45] enhances recommendations accuracy and obtains users, directors, and producers' satisfaction by combining synchronously user-item ratings based on trust, sequential interest, and user implicit interest. Also, the research in [46] illustrates how user's profile characteristics and social relationships effectively improve the recommendations' performance when constructing a user interest network. The technique proposed in [47] applies various interactive factors and tourists' relationships, such as their desires and interests, trust, reputation, affinities, and social community, to calculate the similarity and provide appropriate recommendations.…”
Section: A Social-based Recommender Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[61] Semantic similaritybased [66], [68], [102] Similarity-based method [37], [41], [46], [47], [50], [51], [63], [69], [74], [78], [79], [101], [105], [116] Tensor factorization [31], [36], [94], [95], [110] Many researchers categorize approaches in recommender systems into at least three main approaches [8], [13], [14], [15] as presented in Section II. Following this tendency, in this research, we consider four main approaches for recommender systems, namely 2 : collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, graph-based filtering (GB), and hybrid-based filtering (HB).…”
Section: Regression-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation