1997
DOI: 10.1177/1532673x9702500304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualizing Pac Formation

Abstract: After criticizing current models of political action committee (PAC) formation as flawed both in the samples used in tests and in the specifications tested, we develop a new explanation of PAC formation that emphasizes competition for access among those already engaged in lobbying. We test both organization-and state-level implications of this alternative account, respectively, employing survey and aggregate data on PACs in the American states. The empirical findings provide preliminary support for our explana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Applying the simple ESA model to the US case has proven remarkably productive in generating insights across a range of theoretical issues of concern to interest-group scholars. These include analyses of fluctuations in the number of interest organizations, including how the density of an interest system influences the birth and death rates of organizations; 39 studies of the life cycle of interest organizations over time, the liability of 'newness' for newly mobilized interests, and the condition of density dependence within mature interest communities; 40 analyses of the diversity of or bias within an interest population that highlight how the density functions of different interest guilds combine some interests to advantage; 41 and studies of how the structure of interest populations influences both the use of lobbying tactics 42 and their impact on public policy. 43 The ESA model offers a theoretical construct within which to link these important topics.…”
Section: The Esa Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Applying the simple ESA model to the US case has proven remarkably productive in generating insights across a range of theoretical issues of concern to interest-group scholars. These include analyses of fluctuations in the number of interest organizations, including how the density of an interest system influences the birth and death rates of organizations; 39 studies of the life cycle of interest organizations over time, the liability of 'newness' for newly mobilized interests, and the condition of density dependence within mature interest communities; 40 analyses of the diversity of or bias within an interest population that highlight how the density functions of different interest guilds combine some interests to advantage; 41 and studies of how the structure of interest populations influences both the use of lobbying tactics 42 and their impact on public policy. 43 The ESA model offers a theoretical construct within which to link these important topics.…”
Section: The Esa Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population ecology theory argues that an organization is affected by other similar organizations in its external environment because they all extract similar resources from the same environment (Getz, 2002;Hannan and Carroll, 1992), that will determine both the number and the variety of organizational forms that may successfully co-exist. Diversity in environmental resources permits new or specialized organizational forms to emerge, while large amounts of similar resources results in fewer, generalist organizations which exploit economies of scale (Gray and Lowery, 1997). This theory may explain why companies become politically engaged, rather than relying upon their trade associations or other collective interest groups: the more interests there are that consider the same public official a "friend", the more likely that the company will use independent political action to differentiate itself from others (Getz, 2002).…”
Section: The Perspectives Of Economy Social Political and Management ...mentioning
confidence: 99%