2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciliation of cattle ranching with biodiversity and social inclusion objectives in large private properties in Paraguay and collective indigenous lands in Bolivia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land intensification, especially if carried out on an agro-ecological basis, can often be seen as a path towards sustainability (Latawiec et al, 2014;Milera, 2013;Painter et al, 2020;zu Ermgassen et al, 2018), since this reduces competition for land, helping to achieve the difficult balance between food security and environmental conservation (Godde et al, 2018;Meyfroidt et al, 2018;Parra-Cortés et al, 2019;Painter et al, 2020). In the specific case of Beef-cattle ranches in the Paraguayan Chaco, management practices and strategies to increase cattle-ranching productivity that are currently underused could be generalised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land intensification, especially if carried out on an agro-ecological basis, can often be seen as a path towards sustainability (Latawiec et al, 2014;Milera, 2013;Painter et al, 2020;zu Ermgassen et al, 2018), since this reduces competition for land, helping to achieve the difficult balance between food security and environmental conservation (Godde et al, 2018;Meyfroidt et al, 2018;Parra-Cortés et al, 2019;Painter et al, 2020). In the specific case of Beef-cattle ranches in the Paraguayan Chaco, management practices and strategies to increase cattle-ranching productivity that are currently underused could be generalised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of simulated scenarios is a growing trend that can take advantage of large, frequently underused, but expensive to collect databases, particularly those derived from long-term and costly field experiments (Tedeschi, 2019;Nizar et al, 2021), and it may assist in strategic decision-and policy-making in varied circumstances (Greiner et al, 2014;Ash et al, 2015). As pointed out above, the evaluation of these systems needs to consider many other possible qualitative and quantitative environmental and socio-cultural dimensions (Navas Ríos, 1999;Painter et al, 2020). These include the preservation of traditional rural customs, the use of grazing resources that currently have no alternative outlets, and the provision of environmental services if the system is sustainably managed (Caballero, 2009;Beauchemin et al, 2010;Hoogsteijn and Hoogesteijn, 2010).…”
Section: Implications Of Modelling Extensive Beef Systems For Scenari...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study evaluates the twelve ranches for the social sustainability indicators of human rights, working conditions, and health and safety, and shows that there is little difference in the rankings between the three production systems and that all twelve ranches rank poorly on these indicators [52]. Another study evaluates the role of cattle ranching in achieving the tenth sustainable development goal to reduce inequality in Paraguay and Bolivia [53]. Findings indicate that cattle ranching exacerbates rather than reduces inequality except in cases where Indigenous communities' land rights and internal governance structures are respected and supported.…”
Section: Social Sustainability In the Beef Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%