2010
DOI: 10.14512/gaia.19.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling Agriculture with Biodiversity and Innovations in Plant Breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The farmer-based multiplication of the materials at each selection cycle is an important contribution to strengthening informal or local seed systems and fostering diffusion of gradually improved materials, in turn upscaling the impact of the breeding process on food security and biodiversity conservation 9 . However, one of the major technical and institutional bottlenecks downstream of most processes of participatory plant breeding resides in the phases of quality assurance and dissemination of improved seed beyond the immediate participants to the breeding program.…”
Section: Early Results Implications For Conservation and Use Of Undementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The farmer-based multiplication of the materials at each selection cycle is an important contribution to strengthening informal or local seed systems and fostering diffusion of gradually improved materials, in turn upscaling the impact of the breeding process on food security and biodiversity conservation 9 . However, one of the major technical and institutional bottlenecks downstream of most processes of participatory plant breeding resides in the phases of quality assurance and dissemination of improved seed beyond the immediate participants to the breeding program.…”
Section: Early Results Implications For Conservation and Use Of Undementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, improved varieties are often unavailable or expensive and thus inaccessible to subsistence producers and poorest groups; in addition, they don't always respond to the agro-ecological challenges of marginal areas nor farmers’ preferences for their traditional uses. Therefore, improving the genetic basis of locally relevant underutilized crops and achieving relatively small increases in yields could greatly boost food production, income-generating opportunities and livelihoods 9 in vulnerable areas. It can pave the way for downstream developments, such as quality seed multiplication and dissemination among farmers and, where appropriate, value chain development based on local agricultural biodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How does one breed for farmer’s needs? Involving a large number of farmers in evaluation and selection throughout the selection process is an excellent way to take into account heterogeneity across environments ( Kotschi, 2010 ). This form of decentralized selection is critical in involving and empowering farmers from the beginning of the breeding process.…”
Section: Perspectives On a Gcn-quinoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the demand of a growing population for food, water and land along with uncoordinated land use results in the degradation of natural resources. Second, the crowding out of local varieties through formalized breeding (Kotschi 2010) is accompanied by a change in property rights and use patterns with an asymmetric impact on gender relations, posing a threat to indigenous knowledge.. As formalized, individual titles gain currency, layered use-rights often serving as niches for marginal plants and planters disappear. Additionally, agrobiodiversity loss on the one hand implies the vanishing of varieties from the cropping portfolio; on the other hand, it threatens the experimental and practical knowledge of ecological, economic and social characteristics of local cultivars.…”
Section: The Social-ecological Artefact Agrobiodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%