2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling ecological footprint and ecosystem services in natural capital accounting: Applying a novel framework to the Silk Road Economic Belt in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We introduced ESEQs according to Zhang et al [36] in order to realize the matching of the biological production capacity and the ecosystem service value for each category, referring to the study of Niccolucci et al [33], where analogous equivalence factors re-calculated different land types into comparable land areas with biological productivity. The market value of bioproductive cropland, woodland, grassland, and water bodies is highly correlated with the production value of four types of industries: agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery.…”
Section: Ecological Footprint Monetary Volume Accounting Determining ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We introduced ESEQs according to Zhang et al [36] in order to realize the matching of the biological production capacity and the ecosystem service value for each category, referring to the study of Niccolucci et al [33], where analogous equivalence factors re-calculated different land types into comparable land areas with biological productivity. The market value of bioproductive cropland, woodland, grassland, and water bodies is highly correlated with the production value of four types of industries: agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery.…”
Section: Ecological Footprint Monetary Volume Accounting Determining ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for existing ecological compensation studies that combine ecological footprint and ecosystem service value, we found that there are also some problems, such as the accuracy of accounting, poor optimization of model linkage, and the lack of compensation standards and intradomain allocation [35]. Therefore, this study will introduce ecosystem service equivalence factors (ESEQs) to combine ecological footprints with ecosystem services to realize a reasonable shift from accounting for the physical amount of natural capital to the monetary amount [36]. Based on accounting for the physical and monetary quantities of natural capital and on the supply and demand characteristics of the monetary quantities of natural capital, we will determine the ecological compensation payment areas and beneficiary areas and combine them with regional socioeconomic indicators to determine the ecological compensation standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological assets are the foundation for forming ecological bene ts. Domestic and international research unanimously believes that ecological assets provide rich ecological bene ts to humans [3,4], including not only the provision of material products, water conservation, soil conservation and other regulatory services, but also cultural services such as aesthetics and education [5]. However, the evaluation of ecological bene ts on a global scale varies greatly among different studies in terms of evaluation content, evaluation indicators, evaluation methods, and evaluation results [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%