2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.74.055008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling largeCP-violating phases with bounds on the electric dipole moments in the MSSM

Abstract: The possibility of cancellation between different contributions to d e , d n and d Hg is reconsidered with special emphasis on the region that is phenomenologically interesting (intermediate values of tan and sub-TeV sfermion masses). It is found that in the range favored by electroweak baryogenesis (i.e., jj ' M 1 or jj ' M 2 ), sin M 1 1 can be compatible with the EDM bounds even for slepton masses below 500 GeV. Such large values of the phases promise a successful electroweak baryogenesis. The possibility o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the contributions from θ A 0 are enlarged by large A 0 , and the contributions from θ M 2 , θ µ are lager than θ A 0 by several orders of magnitude, hence the contributions from θ µ are hardly cancelled by θ A 0 (when the cancellation between θ µ and θ A 0 takes place, the maximum value of θ µ is O(10 −3 ), which is not sufficient for the taking place of EWB). It is different from the case in the MSSM [38], in which the maximum value of θ µ can be large enough to the taking place of EWB, when the cancellation happens between the contributions from θ µ and θ A 0 to d e . It results from that, the contributions from sleptons are highly suppressed by large slepton masses, in our chosen parameter space.…”
Section: Numerical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the contributions from θ A 0 are enlarged by large A 0 , and the contributions from θ M 2 , θ µ are lager than θ A 0 by several orders of magnitude, hence the contributions from θ µ are hardly cancelled by θ A 0 (when the cancellation between θ µ and θ A 0 takes place, the maximum value of θ µ is O(10 −3 ), which is not sufficient for the taking place of EWB). It is different from the case in the MSSM [38], in which the maximum value of θ µ can be large enough to the taking place of EWB, when the cancellation happens between the contributions from θ µ and θ A 0 to d e . It results from that, the contributions from sleptons are highly suppressed by large slepton masses, in our chosen parameter space.…”
Section: Numerical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The supersymmetric effects on the EDM of electron has been explored in Refs. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The results show that the most interesting possibility to suppress the electron EDM to below the corresponding experimental upper bound is, the contributions from different phases cancel each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects have been explored in Refs. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The results show that, the most interesting possibility to suppress these EDMs to below the corresponding experimental upper bounds is, the contributions from different phases cancel each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the non-zero phases, satisfying the EDM constraints, may be allowed, as explained in the following sections, and in some details in Refs. [82][83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%