Reconciling order and chaos in multi‐project firms

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the key findings of a doctoral thesis aimed at exploring how multi-project companies reconcile order (efficiency, control, clarity) and chaos (creativity, trust, uncertainty, ambiguity). Methodology: The research was focused on multi-project firms in general and CoPS (Complex Products and Systems) producers in particular (companies involved usually as main contractors in construction and engineering projects). It followed three phases: Exploratory phase (literature review and interviews), Conceptualisation phase (abductive elaboration of the model based on field and longitudinal studies in a multi-project firm), and Validation phase (deductive validation of the model through multi-case study). Findings: The thesis proposes a model to map order and chaos of companies, departments, projects or people based on the complexity faced by the tasks and the flexibility of the organizational structure to deal with it. The analysis of how departments moved in this map led to several findings, such as in the case of mis-balance, higher flexibility is preferable to excessive control. Practical implications: The model provides project practitioners with a tool to evaluate and make sense of the degree of necessary project flexibility, and how this can and should change across the project and disciplines. Originality/Value: This paper assists practitioners and academics to reflect on organisational structures of multi-project companies, how these vary over time and how to avoid the bureaucratisation or the chaotification of structures.

Functional Diversity, Absorptive Capability and Product Success: The Moderating Role of Project Complexity in New Product Development Teams

“…The term ‘complex’ originated in the Latin word complexus , meaning twisted together (Boushaala, ). Complexity is something undesirable that can make an NPD project challenging to perform (Geraldi, ). This study operationalizes project complexity as the extent to which the development process is sophisticated.…”

Towards a conceptualisation of quality in information technology projects

“…management-byorganising rather than managing-by-planning (Williams, 2005), organisation perspective rather than task perspective (Andersen, 2008), agile project management (e.g. Augustine et al, 2005;Highsmith, 2004), order and chaos (Geraldi, 2008). These tensions underlying the attributes of quality identified here can usefully be viewed through the lens of ambidexterity theory.…”

Developing complex-project capability through dynamic organizational learning

“…The research finding of less-structured organizational arrangements in dynamic environmental settings is not new in the business and project literatures (Burns and Stalker, 1961;Geraldi, 2009;Hobday, 2000;Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967). However, what this paper contributes is an underpinning of this finding with a knowledge formation perspective that is based on the Greek problem solving dialectic with the supplementary perspective of disordering-ordering using knowledge entropy (disorder).…”