2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling predicted and observed carbon mineralization in siliciclastic formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25] Mineral trapping is mostly improved characterization models in numerical simulation methods due to their long duration of action and the number of water-rock reactions to be considered. [26,27] In terms of quantifying the storage mechanism of mineral trapping, Xu et al [28] used TOUGHREACT software to analyze and calculate the mass transfer between sandstone and shale formations and the amount of CO2 precipitation, and Klein et al [29] combined geochemical and reservoir simulations to calculate long-term mineralization inventory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Mineral trapping is mostly improved characterization models in numerical simulation methods due to their long duration of action and the number of water-rock reactions to be considered. [26,27] In terms of quantifying the storage mechanism of mineral trapping, Xu et al [28] used TOUGHREACT software to analyze and calculate the mass transfer between sandstone and shale formations and the amount of CO2 precipitation, and Klein et al [29] combined geochemical and reservoir simulations to calculate long-term mineralization inventory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%