2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12942-022-00300-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling public health common good and individual privacy: new methods and issues in geoprivacy

Abstract: This article provides a state-of-the-art summary of location privacy issues and geoprivacy-preserving methods in public health interventions and health research involving disaggregate geographic data about individuals. Synthetic data generation (from real data using machine learning) is discussed in detail as a promising privacy-preserving approach. To fully achieve their goals, privacy-preserving methods should form part of a wider comprehensive socio-technical framework for the appropriate disclosure, use an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on location privacy is expanding to address the impacts caused by the emergence of geospatial data and technologies (Armstrong and Ruggles, 2005; Banerjee, 2019; Clarke and Wigan, 2011; Curry, 1997a; De Montjoye et al, 2013; Dobson, 2009; Swanlund and Schuurman, 2016; Taylor, 2016). Considerable efforts have been made to explore the conceptualization of location privacy (Armstrong et al, 2017; Duckham and Kulik, 2006; Keßler and McKenzie, 2018; Kwan et al, 2004), identify instances where location privacy can be compromised (McKenzie et al, 2016; Wernke et al, 2014), and develop methods to counter surveillance and privacy violations that specifically target or involve geographic locations (Jiang et al, 2021; Kamel Boulos et al, 2022; Lin and Xiao, 2023a; Swanlund and Schuurman, 2019). However, a major problem with the existing literature is its limit to an individualistic approach to privacy that emphasizes individuals’ control over access to their location information that can be used to identify them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on location privacy is expanding to address the impacts caused by the emergence of geospatial data and technologies (Armstrong and Ruggles, 2005; Banerjee, 2019; Clarke and Wigan, 2011; Curry, 1997a; De Montjoye et al, 2013; Dobson, 2009; Swanlund and Schuurman, 2016; Taylor, 2016). Considerable efforts have been made to explore the conceptualization of location privacy (Armstrong et al, 2017; Duckham and Kulik, 2006; Keßler and McKenzie, 2018; Kwan et al, 2004), identify instances where location privacy can be compromised (McKenzie et al, 2016; Wernke et al, 2014), and develop methods to counter surveillance and privacy violations that specifically target or involve geographic locations (Jiang et al, 2021; Kamel Boulos et al, 2022; Lin and Xiao, 2023a; Swanlund and Schuurman, 2019). However, a major problem with the existing literature is its limit to an individualistic approach to privacy that emphasizes individuals’ control over access to their location information that can be used to identify them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the past the collection of geographical data in epidemiological research was mostly completed using questionnaires, today, with GIS and, particularly, with the growing amount of sensor-based data, there is no ceiling for the amount of geographical data that can be collected. Consequently, the privacy and confidentiality of geographic data (geoprivacy) in health research became an important emerging topic ( 5 ). Geoprivacy refers to the “individual rights to prevent disclosure of the location of one’s home, workplace, daily activities, or trips” ( 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%