2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling the conflicts between mitochondrial DNA haplogroup trees of Canis lupus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 120 sequences, including recent Balkan dogs and wolf populations, as well as ancient Bulgarian and Italian samples, were analyzed by a median-joining network (Figure 4, Table S3). All samples (dogs and wolves) were explored as described previously, from position 15,595–15,784 bp (189 bp) of the first amplified region of HVR1 , according to reference sequence EU789787 [9]; haplotypes were determined according to the classifications of [10] and [42], as well as the MitoToolPy program [43]. The results show that most of the ancient and recent dog haplotypes from clades A and B are similar to recent Balkan wolf haplotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About 120 sequences, including recent Balkan dogs and wolf populations, as well as ancient Bulgarian and Italian samples, were analyzed by a median-joining network (Figure 4, Table S3). All samples (dogs and wolves) were explored as described previously, from position 15,595–15,784 bp (189 bp) of the first amplified region of HVR1 , according to reference sequence EU789787 [9]; haplotypes were determined according to the classifications of [10] and [42], as well as the MitoToolPy program [43]. The results show that most of the ancient and recent dog haplotypes from clades A and B are similar to recent Balkan wolf haplotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained sequences were manually edited and aligned by MEGA software version 7.0 [41], using the dog mtDNA sequence NC_002008 [40] and EU789787 [9] as references. Sequences were analyzed by polymorphic SNPs, and haplogroups were determined according to [10,42], as well as the MitoToolPy program [43] () with reference sequence EU789787 [9]. The phylogenetic analysis was based on the archaeological dog samples used in this study, as well as on all available ancient DNA dog sequences in GenBank and the Dome tree [5,6,12,13,15,16,17,22,31,32,33,44] (Table S3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences were aligned using the dog mtDNA sequences NC_002008 and EU789787 as reference, following the steps of previously published papers [6,9,51,52]. Haplogroup assignments were determined through a phylogenetic analysis by creating UPGMA trees in MEGA X (Penn State University, PA, USA) [53], using reference samples with well-defined dog matrilines, available from previous studies [54,55]. The haplogroup of the ancient samples analyzed was also tested through the MitoToolPy program [56], with reference sequence EU789787 [57].…”
Section: Haplotype Identification and Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 79 Tibetan Mastiff mtDNA genomes were classified into specific haplogroups by using MitoToolPy (Peng et al, 2015) with reference to DomeTree (http://dometree.kiz.ac.cn) – dog mtDNA haplogroup tree build 2 (Song et al, 2016). The variants for each of mtDNA genomes were also scored with MitoToolPy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%