“…The stream ecology community has classically considered the allochthonous inputs to be the key basal resource because of their quantitative dominance over in‐stream primary production in low‐order systems and larger, turbid, and heterotrophic rivers (Vannote, Minshall, Cummins, Sedell & Cushing, ). However, more recently there has been a shift in emphasis to the disproportionate importance of autotrophic producers to animal consumer production in streams and larger rivers (Brito, Moulton, De Souza & Bunn, ; Bunn, Davies & Winning, ; Hayden, McWilliam‐Hughes & Cunjak, ; Jardine et al., ; Lau, Leung & Dudgeon, ,b; Lewis, Hamilton, Rodríguez, Saunders & Lasi, ; Neres‐Lima et al., ; Thorp & Bowes, ; Thorp & Delong, ). Conversely, lakes have classically been thought to be driven by autochthonous production (Carpenter, Kitchell & Hodgson, ), but recent studies have suggested that terrestrial carbon inputs support approximately 30%–70% of the zooplankton as well as zoobenthos and fish production (Berggren, Ziegler, St‐Gelais, Beisner & del Giorgio, ; Berggren et al., ; Carpenter et al., ; Cole et al., , ; Grey, Jones & Sleep, ; Jansson, Persson, De Roos, Jones & Tranvik, ; Karlsson, Jonsson, Meili & Jansson, ; Pace et al., , ; Tanentzap et al., ).…”