2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21145-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurable Petri Nets with Transition Priorities and Inhibitor Arcs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many workflow languages rely on Petri nets [2,4]. Priority flow in Petri net-based process models is managed with the help of inhibitor arcs and transition priorities [31]. Inhibitor arcs allow a transition to fire only if the adjacent place is empty.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many workflow languages rely on Petri nets [2,4]. Priority flow in Petri net-based process models is managed with the help of inhibitor arcs and transition priorities [31]. Inhibitor arcs allow a transition to fire only if the adjacent place is empty.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. We can combine subtyping of labels even with transition priorities (see [Pad15]). A category of labelled partial orders, where the partial order is independent of the order of the labeling, is the basis and can be proven to be M-adhesive.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Pad15] the category of partial ordered sets poSets where the objects are partially orders sets and the morphisms are order-preserving maps, that are maps f : A → B preserving the order, so a ≤ a implies f (a) ≤ f (a ). Here, we use for the name space partial ordered sets with a greatest element g and the additional condition that f (g) = g.…”
Section: Construction Of the Name Space For Hierarchical Reconfigurab...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. The classical Petri Nets are not expressive enough and often are extended (e.g., with colors [11], reset and inhibitor arcs [12], priority [13,14] transitions) to enable meaningful process analysis. Such extensions change the semantics of the model and generate incompatible dialects of process-specification languages adopted by various tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%