2002
DOI: 10.1080/09585180210123230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfiguration of the high-security hospitals: some lessons from the mental hospital retraction and reprovision programme in the United Kingdom, 1960-2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall the findings suggest that the clinical profile of the patients is consistent with observations that long stay patients remaining in hospitals are more complex and higher risk. 11 A large proportion (approximately two thirds) of patients are likely to be hard to place in the community. These patients had a more serious history of violence and were rated as being a threat to self or others.…”
Section: Hard To Place Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall the findings suggest that the clinical profile of the patients is consistent with observations that long stay patients remaining in hospitals are more complex and higher risk. 11 A large proportion (approximately two thirds) of patients are likely to be hard to place in the community. These patients had a more serious history of violence and were rated as being a threat to self or others.…”
Section: Hard To Place Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ‘rising patient acuity’ has been cited often throughout the past three decades (Cobb & Cooley 1988, Belcher & Munjas 1990, Angeles & Barbone 1994, Bezyack 1999, Aiken et al. 2001, Abbott 2002, Alexander et al. 2003, Aylott 2007, Chetney 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%