2019
DOI: 10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars and commentators have pointed out that these absences are akin to a "second partition," marking Muslims off from other religious groups in the subcontinent and affording them an inferior citizenship. 47 The protests also question proposals to introduce an India-wide National Register of Citizens, a National Population Register that asks for the date and place of one's parents birth, and a National Social Register, like the controversy-ridden biometric identification scheme, Aadhaar designed to streamline access to the Indian government's welfare schemes. Taken together, these legislative and administrative exercises significantly alter the scaffolding of Indian citizenship, where one's ancestry and origin story might always be questioned by the state, one's patterns of mobility and migration is rendered suspect, and where one's social, political and legal identity is always inadequately documented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars and commentators have pointed out that these absences are akin to a "second partition," marking Muslims off from other religious groups in the subcontinent and affording them an inferior citizenship. 47 The protests also question proposals to introduce an India-wide National Register of Citizens, a National Population Register that asks for the date and place of one's parents birth, and a National Social Register, like the controversy-ridden biometric identification scheme, Aadhaar designed to streamline access to the Indian government's welfare schemes. Taken together, these legislative and administrative exercises significantly alter the scaffolding of Indian citizenship, where one's ancestry and origin story might always be questioned by the state, one's patterns of mobility and migration is rendered suspect, and where one's social, political and legal identity is always inadequately documented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, the BJP‐led NDA coalition amended the Act so that people with ‘one parent who was an illegal migrant at the time of their birth would not be eligible for citizenship by birth’. As Jayal explains ‘[s]ince most of the migrants from Bangladesh were Muslims, this covertly introduced a religion‐based exception to the principle of citizenship by birth, undermining the principle of jus soli’ (2019, p. 35). This requires us to score India as medium before the election of the single party BJP government.…”
Section: Formal Measure 2 Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars and anti‐CAA protestors have called the CAA (Ministry of Law and Justice, 2019) a constitutional crisis (Faisal, 2020; Kaur, 2020; Nizaruddin, 2020; Roy, 2020; Sundaram, 2020). In the beginning, the Citizenship Act of 1955 possessed a progressive, inclusive, and pluralist character, but amendments made between 1986 and 2013 made citizenship more exclusionary and conditional (Jayal, 2019; Roy, 2010). Until 1987, citizenship was granted based on birth and required at least one parent to be Indian (Jayal, 2019; Mander, 2020; Roy, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%