2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6265-207-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfiguring Territoriality in International Economic Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From an analysis of the contractual terms, it emerges that contracts of this nature generate a series of interrelated consequences: they (1) enable a significant transfer of control over extensive areas of the host state's territory to private entities; (2) remove the investment operation from the territorial authority of host countries; (3) and result in the creation of a legal enclave. Typically, such an enclave is entangled in a multiplication and overlap of different spatial, temporal and normative levels that are deprived of the host state's regulatory powers and left to the discretion of the investors (Violi, 2016; Arcuri and Violi, 2017). As recently articulated by Cotula (2020), these enclaves disintegrate the local social and legal regimes to favour the integration of commodified natural resources at a transnational level in global supply chains.…”
Section: Background and Premisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an analysis of the contractual terms, it emerges that contracts of this nature generate a series of interrelated consequences: they (1) enable a significant transfer of control over extensive areas of the host state's territory to private entities; (2) remove the investment operation from the territorial authority of host countries; (3) and result in the creation of a legal enclave. Typically, such an enclave is entangled in a multiplication and overlap of different spatial, temporal and normative levels that are deprived of the host state's regulatory powers and left to the discretion of the investors (Violi, 2016; Arcuri and Violi, 2017). As recently articulated by Cotula (2020), these enclaves disintegrate the local social and legal regimes to favour the integration of commodified natural resources at a transnational level in global supply chains.…”
Section: Background and Premisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Thus, the emergence of a variety of international structures of global governance over the recent period tends to be interpreted as a shift from the former to the latter -in other words, as a form of 'de-territorialisation'. 24 This dichotomy makes it hard to give any real content to the expression 'Union territory', even if it features officially in the TFEU 25 and in parts of the CJEU's case law, 26 other than by reducing it to nothing more than the collection of the territories of the Member States 27 or dismissing it as an 'abuse of language'. 28 Against traditional understandings of territoriality in international law, our critique aims to show that the EU's territory exists over and beyond those of Member States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%