1996
DOI: 10.3133/ofr81728a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconnaissance geologic map of the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, southeastern Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following three units in the Bradfield Canal quadrangle are interpreted in this report to be closely related, and the second two are revised from the interpretation given by Koch and Berg (1996). This reinterpretation was done on the basis of the field relations and compositional similarities and on the available geochronologic information.…”
Section: Description Of Map Units-continuedmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following three units in the Bradfield Canal quadrangle are interpreted in this report to be closely related, and the second two are revised from the interpretation given by Koch and Berg (1996). This reinterpretation was done on the basis of the field relations and compositional similarities and on the available geochronologic information.…”
Section: Description Of Map Units-continuedmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…K-Ar determinations by M. A. Lanphere, U.S. Geological Survey, (written communs., 1981; reported in Brew and others, 1984;and Douglass and others, 1989, p. 64) interpreted to be applicable to the whole suite are as follows: Koch and Berg, 1996). Some of these units are also described in the section on the Brew and Morrell (1983); rocks interpreted to be 100-118 Ma on the basis of their similarity to dated rocks elsewhere (Lanphere and Eberlein, 1966;Himmelberg and Loney (1995) Douglass and others, 1989, p. 65).…”
Section: Description Of Map Units-continuedmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The alternative was to assign the same metamorphic age to these plutons, but that is equally inadequate because not all of them show metamorphic features. The belt was informally named by Brew and Morrell (1983) and is described by Burrell (1984abc); preliminary K-Ar determinations by M. A. Lanphere (U.S. Geological Survey, written communs., 1981Survey, written communs., , 1982 interpreted to be applicable to the whole suite are as follows: Koch, oral commun., 1982;Koch and Berg, 1996). As mapped in this quadrangle, divided into: Ktoc Garnet-Biotite Tonalite and Minor GranodioriteNonfoliated, crowded-plagioclase rock; inequigranular to porphyritic; very fine-to medium-grained; C.I.…”
Section: Intrusive Rocks Of Admiralty-revillagigedo Plutonic Belt Andmentioning
confidence: 99%