2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.84.1455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconnection Rate for the Inhomogeneous Resistivity Petschek Model

Abstract: The reconnection rate for the canonical simplest case of steady-state two-dimensional symmetric reconnection in an incompressible plasma is found by matching of an outer Petschek solution and an internal diffusion region solution. The reconnection rate obtained naturally incorporates both Sweet-Parker and Petschek regimes, while the latter is possible only for a strongly localized resistivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Petschek-like scale separation has therefore been identified as a necessary ingredient for any magnetic reconnection mechanism to work at Alfvénic speeds (Birn et al 2001;Biskamp & Schwarz 2001;Forbes et al 2013), which the Sweet-Parker model famously fails to do. Moreover, when this scale separation does obtain, the structure on the large scales is found to approximate that of Petschek's model (Biernat et al 1987;Heyn & Semenov 1996;Erkaev et al 2000). While the details of the diffusion region remain unclear theoretically, we hereafter use the observational fact of fast flare reconnection to posit that some localized mechanism must be at work, and that the large-scale response will therefore have a Petschek-like structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petschek-like scale separation has therefore been identified as a necessary ingredient for any magnetic reconnection mechanism to work at Alfvénic speeds (Birn et al 2001;Biskamp & Schwarz 2001;Forbes et al 2013), which the Sweet-Parker model famously fails to do. Moreover, when this scale separation does obtain, the structure on the large scales is found to approximate that of Petschek's model (Biernat et al 1987;Heyn & Semenov 1996;Erkaev et al 2000). While the details of the diffusion region remain unclear theoretically, we hereafter use the observational fact of fast flare reconnection to posit that some localized mechanism must be at work, and that the large-scale response will therefore have a Petschek-like structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to imply that Petschek-type reconnection is possible only if the resis- tivity of the plasma is localized to a small region, whereas for constant resistivity, the Sweet-Parker regime is realized (Erkaev et al, 2000). Figure 9 shows the normalized diffusion region electric field (top) and length scale (bottom) as functions of the parameter f .…”
Section: Results Of the Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the diffusion region, it seems to be impossible to find an analytical solution, and hence a solution has to be obtained numerically (Erkaev et al, 2000). The reconnection rate can be determined by matching the solutions corresponding to the diffusion and convective regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown later that spatial non-uniform resistivity is required to support the Petschek type scenario (e.g. Sato and Hayashi, 1979;Biskamp, 1986;Erkaev et al, 2000;Biskamp and Schwarz, 2001;Erkaev et al, 2002). This anomalous resistivity in collisionless plasmas may be caused by microinstabilities, such as the lower hybrid drift instability (Huba et al, 1977), the Buneman instability (Drake et al, 2003), the ion-acoustic instability (Kan, 1971;Coroniti, 1985), or others (Büchner and Daughton, 2007).…”
Section: Fast Reconnectionmentioning
confidence: 99%