2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04792.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsideration of the derivation of Most Probable Numbers, their standard deviations, confidence bounds and rarity values

Abstract: Aims:  The purpose of this work was to derive a simple Excel spreadsheet and a set of standard tables of most probable number (MPN) values that can be applied by users of International Standard Methods to obtain the same output values for MPN, SD of the MPN, 95% confidence limits and test validity. With respect to the latter, it is considered that the Blodgett concept of ‘rarity’ is more valuable than the frequently used approach of improbability (vide de Man). Methods and Results:  The paper describes the sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples (25 g) were added to 225 ml of buffered peptone water and then stomached for 2 min at 260 rpm, and the Salmonella population was quantified with the rapid mini modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis most-probable-number (MPN) assay as described by Shashidhar et al (34), modified so that positive wells were confirmed with the MicroSEQ 16S rDNA identification system for Salmonella detection (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) (6, 7). Estimation of the MPNs and log reductions for the inoculated dry pet food and the contaminated undistributed commercial lots data was completed using the Poisson binomial model formulation as described in Jarvis et al (25). Statistical significance and confidence limits were determined using the alpha = 0.05 level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples (25 g) were added to 225 ml of buffered peptone water and then stomached for 2 min at 260 rpm, and the Salmonella population was quantified with the rapid mini modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis most-probable-number (MPN) assay as described by Shashidhar et al (34), modified so that positive wells were confirmed with the MicroSEQ 16S rDNA identification system for Salmonella detection (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) (6, 7). Estimation of the MPNs and log reductions for the inoculated dry pet food and the contaminated undistributed commercial lots data was completed using the Poisson binomial model formulation as described in Jarvis et al (25). Statistical significance and confidence limits were determined using the alpha = 0.05 level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of Salmonella MPN were calculated based on the presence of PCR-confirmed Salmonella in each of the nine replicates analysed per composited water sample (Jarvis et al 2010; Andrews et al 2014). The lower and upper limits of Salmonella detection were 0.0548 and 11 MPN 100 ml −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, bacteria were detached from 1 g soil or 0.25 g litter by 1 h rotary shaking with a 10fold (w/v) amount of HC-mineral medium (Kloos et al, 2006). All values are calculated as log 10 MPN and respective log 10 standard deviations, and log-normal distribution is assumed (Jarvis et al, 2010). Heterotrophic bacteria were enumerated after growth on diluted Luria Broth (1 : 5 with HC-mineral medium).…”
Section: Cell Enumeration By a Most Probable Number Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%