2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3371-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsideration of the systematics of Peniculida (Protista, Ciliophora) based on SSU rRNA gene sequences and new morphological features of Marituja and Disematostoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monophyly of subclass Peniculia demonstrated by previous works (Chen et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2013; Fokin et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2008; Pan, Gao, et al., 2013; Pan, Liu, et al., 2013; Xu et al, 2018) was confirmed by our phylogenetic analyses (both 18S rDNA‐ and COI‐based phylogenies). Moreover, coherently with previous studies on Peniculia, they pointed out that a monophyly of Frontonia is not supported by molecular data in the 18S rDNA‐ (Chen et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2011, 2013; Fokin et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2008, 2016; Ong'ondo et al., 2013; Pan, Gao, et al., 2013; Pan, Liu, et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2016; Xu et al, 2018) and COI‐based phylogenies (Zhao et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monophyly of subclass Peniculia demonstrated by previous works (Chen et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2013; Fokin et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2008; Pan, Gao, et al., 2013; Pan, Liu, et al., 2013; Xu et al, 2018) was confirmed by our phylogenetic analyses (both 18S rDNA‐ and COI‐based phylogenies). Moreover, coherently with previous studies on Peniculia, they pointed out that a monophyly of Frontonia is not supported by molecular data in the 18S rDNA‐ (Chen et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2011, 2013; Fokin et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2008, 2016; Ong'ondo et al., 2013; Pan, Gao, et al., 2013; Pan, Liu, et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2016; Xu et al, 2018) and COI‐based phylogenies (Zhao et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, some rare members of Peniculia have been molecularly characterized, such as Disematostoma (Rossi et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2018) and Marituja (Xu et al., 2018). Nevertheless, the obtained phylogenetic reconstructions appeared even more problematic, underlining the paraphyly of Marituja and Disematostoma (Xu et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polyphyly of Frontonia was recognized in 2007 by Andreoli et al [55,56]. Since then, several studies on the molecular phylogeny of this genus have confirmed this finding [10,17,25,41,54,57]. Our phylogenetic trees also show the polyphyly of Frontonia, as members of Frontonia are separated into three phylogenetically distinct groups (Fig.…”
Section: Phylogeny Of Frontoniasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is also noteworthy that Peritromidae have certain characters in common with karyorelicteans, such as extrusomes and a glabrous stripe (Foissner, 1998). This may indicate that Peritromidae represent a transitional group in the evolution from Karyorelictea to Heterotrichea (Xu et al, 2018). Based on the morphological and molecular evidence, we speculate that Peritromidae are the basal lineage of Heterotrichea.…”
Section: The Basal Lineage Of Class Heterotrichea (Spirostomidae or Peritromidae)mentioning
confidence: 72%