2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-019-00431-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsideration of three screening tests for dysphagia in patients with cerebrovascular disease performed by non-expert examiners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because cervical auscultation is easily performed using a stethoscope, it allows for repeated evaluations of swallowing ability in a noninvasive manner. This is convenient for observing a patient's daily eating status and provides important information for screening and dietary adjustment (Watanabe et al, 2020). However, because swallowing sounds are composed of initial clicks and the sound of bolus transfer and because the final pops are generated in <1 s, they can only be heard as a single sound, and consequently, sensory evaluation is difficult (Leslie et al, 2004; Morinière et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because cervical auscultation is easily performed using a stethoscope, it allows for repeated evaluations of swallowing ability in a noninvasive manner. This is convenient for observing a patient's daily eating status and provides important information for screening and dietary adjustment (Watanabe et al, 2020). However, because swallowing sounds are composed of initial clicks and the sound of bolus transfer and because the final pops are generated in <1 s, they can only be heard as a single sound, and consequently, sensory evaluation is difficult (Leslie et al, 2004; Morinière et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swallowing function had been assessed in all patients by two speech-language-hearing therapists using dysphagia screening consisting of a repetitive saliva swallowing test [ 19 ], a modified water swallowing test [ 20 ], a food test [ 20 ], and cervical auscultation [ 21 ]. The cervical auscultation findings were compared with “clear” expiration before water was swallowed, and when breathing, sound wetness, stridor, coughing, throat clearing, or voice distortion was judged as “abnormal.” Patients in whom these tests could not exclude the possibility of dysphagia underwent a more detailed swallowing evaluation in the form of FEES and/or VFSS performed by an otolaryngologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when looking at including measures such as CA with the CSE, reliability of both measures can be improved. A study combined CA with a water swallow test to determine the presence of dysphagia (Watanabe et al, 2020), which revealed that even non-swallowing experts were able to accurately detect dysphagia using these methods. Bergström, Svensson and Hartelius et al (2014) carried out an interesting study evaluating the use of CA together with the bedside assessment and then compared their findings with FEES.…”
Section: The Assessment Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%