2020
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsidering Aromatase for Breast Cancer Treatment: New Roles for an Old Target

Abstract: The current therapeutic approach for the treatment of hormone dependent breast cancer includes interference with estrogen receptors via either selective modulators or estrogens deprivation, by preventing their biosynthesis with aromatase inhibitors. Severe side effects and acquired resistance are drawbacks of both drug classes, and the efforts to overcome these issues still allow for research in this field to be animated. This review reports on recent findings that have opened new avenues for reconsidering the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of a third marker, the progesterone receptor (PR, NR3C3), an ERα target gene, reflects active estrogenic signaling and is a marker of improved prognosis compared to PR-negative tumors [ 3 ]. ER+ and/or PR+ tumors represent more than two-thirds of breast cancer cases and are currently treated with hormonal therapies that most commonly include aromatase inhibitors, which suppress endogenous estrogen production, or antiestrogens, which compete with estrogens for binding to estrogen receptors and inactivate them by inducing alternative conformations of their ligand-binding domains [ 4 , 5 ]. On the other hand, primary tumors with undetectable ER expression levels and activity are intrinsically resistant to hormonal therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of a third marker, the progesterone receptor (PR, NR3C3), an ERα target gene, reflects active estrogenic signaling and is a marker of improved prognosis compared to PR-negative tumors [ 3 ]. ER+ and/or PR+ tumors represent more than two-thirds of breast cancer cases and are currently treated with hormonal therapies that most commonly include aromatase inhibitors, which suppress endogenous estrogen production, or antiestrogens, which compete with estrogens for binding to estrogen receptors and inactivate them by inducing alternative conformations of their ligand-binding domains [ 4 , 5 ]. On the other hand, primary tumors with undetectable ER expression levels and activity are intrinsically resistant to hormonal therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies have not demonstrated significant differences in markers of bone turnover between exemestane, anastrozole, and letrozole arms ( 127 ). There is evidence that exemestane use results in less BMD loss compared to letrozole and anastrozole at 24 months of therapy ( 128 , 129 ), though it remains to be seen if fewer patients on exemestane develop fractures. The MA.27 trial comparing exemestane with anastrozole in the adjuvant setting identified less reported osteoporosis in patients randomized to exemestane, 31% vs 35% in the exemestane and the anastrozole arm (p=0.001), respectively ( 130 ), however further analysis within the MA.27 cohort showed no significant differences in BMD between exemestane and anastrozole at 24 months ( 130 ).…”
Section: Manifestations Of Aimssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With greater understanding of the mechanisms of AIMSS, HR+ breast cancer therapies with fewer musculoskeletal symptoms can be developed. Advancements in pharmacologic research increase optimism for the design of more tolerable therapies targeting aromatase that spare musculoskeletal tissues from toxicities of estrogen deprivation ( 128 , 132 ).…”
Section: Manifestations Of Aimssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its key role in estrogens’ biosynthesis, aromatase has been recognized as a crucial target in hormone-dependent cancers [ 68 ]. Despite being highly effective, aromatase inhibitors generally lead to cardiovascular events increase and bone density reduction [ 69 ]. Moreover, selective estrogen receptors modulators, which mainly represent the alternative therapeutic approach in these tumors, have shown additional issues in long-term therapies, such as increased risk of endometrial cancer and drug resistance [ 70 ].…”
Section: The Interplay Between Metabolism and Cancer: Unexplored Targets And Future Challenges Within Adiporonmentioning
confidence: 99%