The purpose of this study was to investigate the legal, psychological, and tactical forensic aspects of communication with witnesses during court interrogation, as well as to determine the impact of these aspects on the use of their testimony as evidence and the dynamics of the trial. The methodological framework of the study included the theoretical analysis of the communicative aspects of testimonies, a review of scientific publications on this problematic, and the application of the structural and functional method. The study examined the communicative features of judicial examination of witnesses in criminal proceedings as a valuable tool for obtaining information about the factual circumstances of a case. The study showed that the success of a communication act during interrogation largely depends on the ability of the person conducting it to manage the course of communication and establish psychological contact with the witness. The complex and multifaceted nature of witness interrogation, which requires compliance with procedural rules and the use of forensic recommendations, was confirmed. It was found that psychological aspects play a significant role in communication during judicial interrogation. The study examined the role of the prosecutor and the defence lawyer in establishing the circumstances of the case through effective communication with witnesses. The study summarised the legal, psychological, and tactical features of obtaining testimony during various types of judicial interrogation, especially direct and cross-examination, with an emphasis on asking questions, including leading questions. This study will contribute to the development of practical recommendations for prosecutors and defence lawyers on effective communication with witnesses and improving their professional skills