Reconsidering nutrition science: critical reflection with a cultural lens

Abstract

BackgroundEuropean culture gave birth to modern science as a means to investigate and explain the natural world. The biomedical disciplines that have since emerged, including nutrition, presuppose a web of basic presuppositions, background assumptions and implicit cultural values that are often overlooked and escape peer review. These "hidden subjectivities" are widely taken-for-granted while exerting a powerful hold on the scope, direction and patterns of disciplinary thought. Nutrition science currently has no accepted means of collectively attending to hidden subjectivities embedded within its methods and practice. Here I propose that directing inquiry into these dimensions holds potential to advance our discipline.MethodsThis critically reflective approach emerged from critical theory and the practice of cross-cultural engagement (CCE). CCE deliberately seeks out and critically engages food and health understandings of non-European cultures. Its protocol includes cognitive frameshifting, a practice of temporarily stepping outside of habitual thought patterns and into a non-biomedical framework of background assumptions. A cultural lens metaphor derives from CCE practice and is forwarded here as a viable means for restoring critically reflective attention to hidden subjectivities while also inviting further CCE practice within the discipline.ResultsCritical reflection with a cultural lens allows cognitive attachments to materialism, reductionism, mechanistic thought, naïve realism, control over nature and pervasive subject-object dichotomies between mind and matter, scientist and nature, experience and reality, among many others to become more available for critical consideration. Culturally diverse food and health understandings otherwise dismissed as "unscientific" or held in abeyance gain value as alternative assumptive frameworks and cognitive models that can be temporarily inhabited for further intercultural reflection and insight.ConclusionCritical reflection with a cultural lens allows reconsideration of nutrition science in light of its culturally specific origin and foundation. This perspective can advance the discipline in two ways. First, it extends skeptical inquiry into hidden subjectivities that are otherwise implicit and seldom given over to critical consideration. Second, it can broaden scholarly inquiry through deliberate attempts to cross cognitive boundaries and empathically inhabit different cognitive worlds. This developmental practice holds potential to both deepen and broaden disciplinary inquiry.

Identifying Barriers and Enablers in the Dietary Management of Type 2 Diabetes in M’Bour, Senegal

“…Families that participate in meal planning and preparation facilitate understanding and healthier dietary habits for the diabetic family members and, in some cases, the entire family (Figure 1). Hassel (2014) suggests that the consideration of culture in nutritional science and programming is a necessary next step in nutritional programming and interventions. Furthermore, higher dietary quality has been associated with decreased mortality in SSA (Boggs, Ban, Palmer, & Rosenberg, 2015) and is an even more urgent issue among diabetics and those at increased risk (e.g., relatives of diabetics; Mayor, 2015) in SSA.…”

Balanced Diets: Analyzing Restrictive Eurocentrism in Nutrition Standards

“…The knowledge of indigenous peoples is usually considered "unscientific", and therefore, has been blocked from mainstream nutrition science. Most indigenous sciences do not share the extreme subject/object separation that is inherent within biomedical thought of Eurocentric origin (Hassel, 2014). Rather than attempt to detach oneself as an observer isolated from the natural world in order to gain more "objective" knowledge, many indigenous peoples maintain an intimate participatory relationship with an interwoven and inter-related natural world, of which food and health relationships are a prime example (Hassel, 2014).…”

The scientific production of Nutrition published by the Scientific Electronic Library under the gaze of the evaluation of the Coordination for the Development of Higher Education Personnel

“…Distinct analyses on the science of nutrition both in the global context, as in Brazil, direct their multidisciplinary (interdisciplinary and/or transdisciplinary) character to linking biological, social, and environmental dimensions. Nevertheless, the hegemony of the biomedical paradigm [41] has been demonstrated throughout the historical process of the establishment, consolidation, and development of this scientific field [2,6,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48].…”