Reconsidering Social Equity in Public Transit

Abstract

Over the course of this century, public transit sys tems in the U.S. have lost most of the market share of metropolitan travel to private vehicles. The two principal markets that remain fo r public transit systems are downtown commuters and transit dependents-people who are too young, too old. too poor, or physically unable to drive. Despite the fa ct that transit dependents are the steadiest customers fo r most public transit sys tems. transit policy has tended to fo cus on recapturing lost markets through expanded suburban bus, express bus, and fued rail systems. Such efforts have collectively proven expensive and only marginally effective. At the same time, comparatively less attention and fe wer resources tend to be devoted to improving well-patronized transit service in low income, central-city areas serving a high proportion of transit dependents. This paper explores this issue through an examination of both the evolving demographics of public transit ridership, and the reasons for shifts in transit policies toward attracting automobile users onto buses and trains. We conclude that the growing dissonance between the quality of service provided to inner-city residents who depend on local buses and the level of public resources being spent to attract new transit riders is both economically inefficient and socially inequitable. In light of this. we propose that transportation planners concerned with social justice (and economic efficiency) should re-examine current public transit policies and plans.

Vulnerability modeling of casinos in the United States: A case study of Philadelphia

“…Bus ridership in the United States is traditionally associated with populations that are socioeconomically disadvantaged, such as low-income individuals and minorities (Taylor et al, 2002;Pucher & Renne, 2003;Garrett & Taylor, 1999). According to the Philadelphia mayor's office, more than 35% of Philadelphians do not own a car, and 25% of those below 100% of the poverty level in the Philadelphia metropolitan area commute by public transit according to 2010 ACS census information (Philadelphia Mayor's Office of Transportation and Utilities, 2013, Means of transportation, 2010).…”

Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity

“…The other focus has been called the ''social transit'' perspective (Betts, 2007). Its goal is to provide transit access to those with greatest ''need,'' such as those without private transport or specific demographic groups such as the low-income, youth or ethnic minorities (Murray and Davis, 2001;Ward, 2005;Garrett and Taylor, 1999;Deakin, 2007). This is a vertical equity perspective as it prioritises the needs of specific groups over others.…”

Land use and transit ridership connections: Implications for state-level planning agencies

“…Consequently, the literature on frameworks of such coordination under existing governance structures remains underdeveloped (Garrett and Taylor, 2003).…”