2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-018-0123-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstitution of anaphase DNA bridge recognition and disjunction

Abstract: Faithful chromosome segregation requires that the sister chromatids be disjoined completely. Defective disjunction can lead to the persistence of histone-free threads of DNA known as ultra-fine bridges (UFBs) that connect the separating sister DNA molecules during anaphase. UFBs arise at specific genomic loci and can only be visualized by detection of associated proteins such as PICH, BLM, topoisomerase IIIα, and RPA. However, it remains unknown how these proteins work together to promote UFB processing. We us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Phosphorylation of RPA abrogates or changes this interaction and decreases BLM's ability to initiate at ss/ds junctions, in addition to promoting the intrinsic strandswitching activity of BLM. Regulation of BLM strand switching may be important during the later stages of HR (i.e., joint molecule dissolution), Holliday junction migration, resolution of ultra-fine bridges, and at stalled replication forks (Bachrati and Hickson, 2008;Bizard and Hickson, 2014;Croteau et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Machwe et al, 2006;Ralf et al, 2006;Sarlós et al, 2018;Wu and Hickson, 2003). In the context of DNA resection, one of the two ssDNA strands are degraded by a nuclease, forcing BLM to slow down or stall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylation of RPA abrogates or changes this interaction and decreases BLM's ability to initiate at ss/ds junctions, in addition to promoting the intrinsic strandswitching activity of BLM. Regulation of BLM strand switching may be important during the later stages of HR (i.e., joint molecule dissolution), Holliday junction migration, resolution of ultra-fine bridges, and at stalled replication forks (Bachrati and Hickson, 2008;Bizard and Hickson, 2014;Croteau et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Machwe et al, 2006;Ralf et al, 2006;Sarlós et al, 2018;Wu and Hickson, 2003). In the context of DNA resection, one of the two ssDNA strands are degraded by a nuclease, forcing BLM to slow down or stall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects in this process can lead to the persistence of DNA threads known as ultra-fine bridges (UFBs) between separating sister chromatids during anaphase (Biebricher et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2014;Sarlos et al, 2018). Timely disjunction of sister chromatids is critical for faithful chromosome segregation.…”
Section: Bub1 Kinase Promotes the Timely Decatenation Of Sister Chrommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timely disjunction of sister chromatids is critical for faithful chromosome segregation. Defects in this process can lead to the persistence of DNA threads known as ultra-fine bridges (UFBs) between separating sister chromatids during anaphase (Biebricher et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2014;Sarlos et al, 2018). UFBs are devoid of histones and usually cannot be stained with conventional DNA dyes, but can be visualized by detection of associated proteins such as the SNF2 family DNA translocase PICH (Baumann et al, 2007) and the Bloom syndrome helicase BLM Ke et al, 2011).…”
Section: Bub1 Kinase Promotes the Timely Decatenation Of Sister Chrommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devoid of catalytic activity, the RMI1 might stabilize the open form of the Topoisomerase IIIα to favor strand passage. Finally, one family of ultra fine bridges has been shown to be decorated by the BTRR complex and it is possible that the decatenase activity of Topoisomerase IIIα be used to resolve their inter-strand links [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species were resolved by electrophoresis under native conditions. Three DNAs were tested for their binding to SND1-64: dsMC09 (lanes 1-5); dsMC10 (lane 6-10); HC (lanes [11][12][13][14][15]. Concentrations of protein were as indicated (lanes 1, 6, 11: 0; lanes 2, 7, 12: 0.1 µM; lanes 3, 8, 13: 0.3 µM; lanes 4, 9, 14: 0.9 µM; lanes 5, 10, 15: 2.7 µM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%