1991
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstitution of high-affinity opioid agonist binding in brain membranes.

Abstract: In synaptosomal membranes from rat brain (12,13).Although the results outlined above have implicated modulationt of ligand-receptor interaction by G proteins, they did not establish the molecular identity of the high-and lowaffinity components of opioid binding. In this study, we have directly linked high-affinity opioid agonist binding and opioid-sensitive GTPase activity to membrane G protein. Inactivation of G protein at high pH abolished high-affinity agonist, but not antagonist, binding. Guanine nucleoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously described the functional coupling of A, 8, and K opioid receptors to G proteins in brain membranes (23,24) and have subsequently characterized the ,u opioid receptor-G protein complex formed upon receptor occupancy by agonists (25). Recently, we have quantified the functional responses of G protein and adenylyl cyclase in normal (26) and opioid-tolerant (27) SH-SY5Y neural cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously described the functional coupling of A, 8, and K opioid receptors to G proteins in brain membranes (23,24) and have subsequently characterized the ,u opioid receptor-G protein complex formed upon receptor occupancy by agonists (25). Recently, we have quantified the functional responses of G protein and adenylyl cyclase in normal (26) and opioid-tolerant (27) SH-SY5Y neural cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulation of ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors, including the opioid, occurs through receptor-transducer association and dissociation, a process modulated by guanine nucleotides and ions. The high-affinity binding state, representing the ternary complex of agonist-occupied receptor and G protein (4), converts in the presence of GTP or its stable analogues into the low-affinity, G proteinuncoupled, form of the receptor. Previous studies with several receptors, including txl-and 13adrenergic and dopamine have described the formation of a high-affinity agonist state of receptor at low (2-4 °C) temperatures (5-7) or by a combination of deoxycholate and low temperature (8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular consequence of sodium binding to the opioid receptor was suggested to be a conformational change from an “agonist‐favoring” to an “antagonist‐favoring” state (Simon and Groth, 1975; Simon and Hiller, 1981), although in the present study this simple conformational model does not fully explain the observed changes in receptor binding because agonist binding was strongly modulated by sodium, whereas antagonist binding was unaffected. The presence of a G protein has been shown to be required for the stabilization of the high‐affinity opioid agonist binding (Remmers and Medzihradsky, 1991 a ). In the absence of G protein, the receptor exists in a conformation with low affinity for ligand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding of opioid ligands is modulated by addition of sodium and guanine nucleotides (Blume, 1978; Ott and Costa, 1988). High‐affinity binding of agonists to the receptor requires the association of receptor with G protein (Remmers and Medzihradsky, 1991 a ), and addition of sodium or guanine nucleotides dissociates this complex to convert the receptor to a conformation with low affinity for agonist (Blume, 1978; Childers and Snyder, 1980; Ott and Costa, 1988). In contrast, antagonist binding is increased by sodium and unchanged by further addition of guanine nucleotides, indicating an insensitivity to the presence of G protein (Simantov et al, 1976; Childers and Snyder, 1980; Nijssen and Childers, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%