2003
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v102.3.839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstitution of the Epstein-Barr virus–specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response following T-cell–depleted myeloablative and nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Abstract: The recovery of circulating antigen-specific T-cell immunity to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was determined in ELIspot assays following allogeneic myeloablative or nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (MST/NST). In 8 of 12 MST patients receiving an alemtuzumab-treated graft, the frequency of the EBV-specific reactivities was similar to or greater than that seen in the healthy controls. A response was detectable in 3 of 6 and 6 of 9 patients by 3 and 6 months, respectively, and in all patients by one year fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Preemptive treatment with rituximab was started when the EBV-DNA level exceeded 1000 copies per 10 5 cells on more than one occasion as recently described by Blaes et al 15 With this strategy, EBV reactivation, defined as a viral load of 1000 copies per 10 5 cells, was detected in five patients for a cumulative incidence of 9 and 17% at 6 months and 2 years, respectively, after RIC UCBT, which is comparable to the incidence reported after RIC BM and PBSC HSCT. 24,25 This is also comparable with the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation that we reported for 175 consecutive patients who received RIC allo-HSCT in our institution (15% at 6 months). However, with the strategy of preemptive treatment of EBV reactivation, none of these patients developed EBV-LPD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Preemptive treatment with rituximab was started when the EBV-DNA level exceeded 1000 copies per 10 5 cells on more than one occasion as recently described by Blaes et al 15 With this strategy, EBV reactivation, defined as a viral load of 1000 copies per 10 5 cells, was detected in five patients for a cumulative incidence of 9 and 17% at 6 months and 2 years, respectively, after RIC UCBT, which is comparable to the incidence reported after RIC BM and PBSC HSCT. 24,25 This is also comparable with the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation that we reported for 175 consecutive patients who received RIC allo-HSCT in our institution (15% at 6 months). However, with the strategy of preemptive treatment of EBV reactivation, none of these patients developed EBV-LPD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…At first, a total dose of 100 mg of alemtuzumab spread over 5 days was widely used [3,25]. Alemtuzumab at this dose was highly effective for preventing acute and chronic GVHD, but it delayed immune recovery and increased the incidence of viral infection [26,27]. In addition, patients who underwent reduced-intensity HSCT with alemtuzumab and CSA as GVHD prophylaxis required donor lymphocyte infusion for disease control more frequently than those who received GVHD prophylaxis with CSA and methotrexate [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on May 9, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From less rigorous T-cell depletion used in nonmyeloablative unrelated donor SCT. 38 Our study was not designed with sufficient power to demonstrate clinical efficacy. While infections and viral reactivations were frequent, the overall incidence of directly infectious deaths was low (2 of 16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%