Reconstrucción virtual y visualización 3d del yacimiento arqueológico Castellet de Bernabé (Lliria, España)

Portalés, Cristina; Alonso-Monasterío, Pau; Blasco, María José Viñals

doi:10.4995/var.2017.5890

Cited by 24 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, the virtual 3D reconstruction has been the object of different works (Gutiérrez Baños, Morillo Rodríguez, San José Alonso, & Fernández Martín, 2016;Portalés, Alonso-Monasterio, & Viñals, 2017), but complementary to the information provided in the present study.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 58%

Digital 3D reconstruction of Betancourt’s historical heritage: the dredging machine in the Port of Kronstadt

Rojas‐Sola¹,

Fuente²

2018

Virtual archaeol. rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights:• A digital restitution of the 3D model of the Agustín de Betancourt's dredger, Port of Kronstadt, has been made, first of its type in the world.• Elements not detailed in the original planimetry were intuited, and dimensional/geometrical hypotheses were made respecting coherence.• For the characterization of different elements of the ensemble, the materials used at the time and the absence of normalization were handled. Abstract:Agustín de Betancourt was one of the most distinguished engineers of the 18 th and 19 th centuries with numerous contributions to various fields of engineering, including civil engineering. This research shows the process followed in documenting the cultural heritage of this engineer from the Canary Islands (Spain), especially in the geometric documentation of the Kronstadt harbour-dredging machine presented in 1808. The initial information was taken from the Canary Orotava Foundation, History of Science, which has been compiling information on the Betancourt Digital Project for years. In particular, there are only 8 colour illustrations without scale, as well as a small report on the description of the parts and the operation of a dredging machine previously designed for the Port of Venice (but never put into operation). This was the basis for the construction of the dredging machine for the Port of Kronstadt (Russia) that did go into operation in 1812 for more than 10 years. From this information, 3D reconstruction was made by means of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) techniques thanks to the use of the Autodesk Inventor Professional parametric software, which made it possible to build the 3D model and complete its geometric documentation as well as different detailed plans and exploded views. The results show a reliable approach to its modelling, a process in which several dimensional and operational hypotheses have had to be assumed due to the lack of existing information.Key words: cultural heritage; geometric documentation; 3D reconstruction; Agustín de Betancourt; dredging machine; Autodesk Inventor Professional Resumen:Agustín de Betancourt fue uno de los más ilustres ingenieros de los siglos XVIII y XIX, siendo muy numerosas sus aportaciones a diferentes ámbitos de la ingeniería, en particular a la ingeniería civil. La presente investigación muestra el proceso seguido en la documentación del patrimonio cultural del citado ingeniero español, en particular, en la documentación geométrica de la máquina dragadora del puerto de Krondstadt que presentó en 1808. La información de partida se ha podido rescatar de la Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia que lleva años recopilando información sobre el Proyecto Digital Betancourt; en concreto, se ha dispuesto únicamente de 8 ilustraciones sin escala y en color, así como de una pequeña memoria sobre su funcionamiento y descripción de las partes de un ingenio de máquina dragadora que diseñó previamente para el Puerto de Venecia (pero que nunca entró en funcionamiento), y sobre el que se apoyó para la construcción de la ...

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 58%

Digital 3D reconstruction of Betancourt’s historical heritage: the dredging machine in the Port of Kronstadt

Rojas‐Sola¹,

Fuente²

2018

Virtual archaeol. rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Β) Documentation of museum objects [25,26]. C) Management of archaeological sites and museum tasks concerning cultural heritage (improve in quality, accessibility, reclaiming of digital content) [27][28][29]. D) Multimedia technologies, digital reconstructions, simulation of artifacts and monuments, and 3D VR.…”

Section: How Archaeometry Work For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Archaeometry’s Role in Cultural Heritage Sustainability and Development

Liritzis

Korka

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interdisciplinary field of archaeometry covers a wide range of subject categories and disciplines in relation to science and humanities. It is a well-established academic field of study and accredited part of higher education. Since its inception, the nomenclature designation of archaeometry signifies the appropriate methodology applied to archaeological materials and questions emerging from this field, regarding monuments, artifacts, and the reconstruction and management of landscape bearing cultural assets. The measurements of tangible culture denote significant information, such as chronology, authenticity, technology, characterization, provenance, discovering buried antiquities, ancient-day life activities, and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions and modelling; furthermore, proxy data collected from environmental dynamic non-liner perturbations, which link local ecosystems with dwellings, are gathered by academia to study the past. The traditional rooting signifies the cultural legacies of people, which define the human desire and the confidence of memory and future trends. Beyond the mere study of the past, archaeometry’s role increasingly proves affinity to prosperity, if properly managed. The major archaeometrical contributions in cultural heritage and archaeology in general are reviewed herein, and we present the policies that could develop archaeometrical data into a sustainable stage of local, regional, and national economic development. Τhe United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) conventions for the documentation and protection of cultural heritage via new technologies and archaeometry are reviewed and connected to development strategies and sustainable development goals.

show abstract

“…For instance, researches on findings, such as potteries, coins or metal items, usually produce large sets of records with a relevant number of attributes for each record; this kind of data can be normally managed through relational databases, which organizes contents into tables. Other important data coming from archaeological investigations are spatial data, including maps, ancient cartography, plans, sections, and 3D data (Portalés et al, 2017). As the use of digital surveying techniques has been constantly increasing over the last decade, new datasets are available.…”

Section: Archaeological Data and Open Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Archaeological documentation and data sharing: digital surveying and open data approach applied to archaeological fieldworks

Previtali

Valente

2019

Virtual archaeol. rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The open data paradigm is changing the research approach in many fields such as remote sensing and the social sciences. This is supported by governmental decisions and policies that are boosting the open data wave, and in this context archaeology is also affected by this new trend. In many countries, archaeological data are still protected or only limited access is allowed. However, the strong political and economic support for the publication of government data as open data will change the accessibility and disciplinary expertise in the archaeological field too. In order to maximize the impact of data, their technical openness is of primary importance. Indeed, since a spreadsheet is more usable than a PDF of a table, the availability of digital archaeological data, which is structured using standardised approaches, is of primary importance for the real usability of published data. In this context, the main aim of this paper is to present a workflow for archaeological data sharing as open data with a large level of technical usability and interoperability. Primary data is mainly acquired through the use of digital techniques (e.g. digital cameras and terrestrial laser scanning). The processing of this raw data is performed with commercial software for scan registration and image processing, allowing for a simple and semi-automated workflow. Outputs obtained from this step are then processed in modelling and drawing environments to generate digital models, both 2D and 3D. These crude geometrical data are then enriched with further information to generate a Geographic Information System (GIS) which is finally published as open data using Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards to maximise interoperability.Highlights:<ul><li>Open data will change the accessibility and disciplinary expertise in the archaeological field.</li><li>The main aim of this paper is to present a workflow for archaeological data sharing as open data with a large level of interoperability.</li><li>Digital acquisition techniques are used to document archaeological excavations and a Geographic Information System (GIS) is generated that is published as open data.</li></ul>

show abstract

Reconstrucción virtual y visualización 3d del yacimiento arqueológico Castellet de Bernabé (Lliria, España)

Cited by 24 publications

References 18 publications

Digital 3D reconstruction of Betancourt’s historical heritage: the dredging machine in the Port of Kronstadt

Digital 3D reconstruction of Betancourt’s historical heritage: the dredging machine in the Port of Kronstadt

Archaeometry’s Role in Cultural Heritage Sustainability and Development

Archaeological documentation and data sharing: digital surveying and open data approach applied to archaeological fieldworks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About