2012
DOI: 10.1628/219222712801608531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing Ancient Israel: Integrating Macro- and Micro-archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preserved archaeological record represents only a small portion of what was deposited at a site during its occupation. The ability to determine what components have disappeared during burial in sediments is of paramount importance in the reconstruction of past human activities, especially at the microscopic scale (Finkelstein et al, 2012; Karkanas, 2010; Karkanas, Bar‐Yosef, Goldberg, & Weiner, 2000). Since minerals are the main component of archaeological deposits (including artifacts), most of the information about the missing record can be obtained from minerals.…”
Section: Archaeological Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preserved archaeological record represents only a small portion of what was deposited at a site during its occupation. The ability to determine what components have disappeared during burial in sediments is of paramount importance in the reconstruction of past human activities, especially at the microscopic scale (Finkelstein et al, 2012; Karkanas, 2010; Karkanas, Bar‐Yosef, Goldberg, & Weiner, 2000). Since minerals are the main component of archaeological deposits (including artifacts), most of the information about the missing record can be obtained from minerals.…”
Section: Archaeological Significancementioning
confidence: 99%