2017
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing Antibody Repertoires from Error-Prone Immunosequencing Reads

Abstract: Transforming error-prone immunosequencing datasets into antibody repertoires is a fundamental problem in immunogenomics, and a prerequisite for studies of immune responses. Although various repertoire reconstruction algorithms were released in the last three years, it remains unclear how to benchmark them and how to assess the accuracy of the reconstructed repertoires. We describe an accurate IgReC algorithm for constructing antibody repertoires from high-throughput immunosequencing datasets and a new framewor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many computational approaches have been developed in the last decade to process and analyze HTS immune repertoire data , including software tools that can be used to extract TCR or BCR repertoires from raw sequencing reads (e.g., MiXCR, Vidjil, IMSEQ, IgReC ). This typically includes creating a list of clonotypes with determined CDR3, V, D, and J segments and their borders, as well as each clonotype's count and basic error correction, based on the collapsing of similar sequences.…”
Section: Hts‐based Methods Of Immune Repertoire Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many computational approaches have been developed in the last decade to process and analyze HTS immune repertoire data , including software tools that can be used to extract TCR or BCR repertoires from raw sequencing reads (e.g., MiXCR, Vidjil, IMSEQ, IgReC ). This typically includes creating a list of clonotypes with determined CDR3, V, D, and J segments and their borders, as well as each clonotype's count and basic error correction, based on the collapsing of similar sequences.…”
Section: Hts‐based Methods Of Immune Repertoire Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replication of the entire repertoire using 5’RACE would still require the use of multiple constant region primers, leading to the same multiplexing issues. Barcoding can have errors and chimeric reads making repertoires difficult to reconstruct . This latter issue is not a problem with our RNASeq data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barcoding can have errors and chimeric reads making repertoires difficult to reconstruct. 42 This latter issue is not a problem with our RNASeq data.…”
Section: F I G U R E 5 High-frequency Cdr3smentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Methods using paired end Illumina sequencing have advanced, however, allowing the capture of longer reads and sequencing of the full variable region and subclass isotyping with certain 2x 300 bp paired end sequencing methods 74. While Illumina offers unprecedented read counts, reconstructing libraries of antibody sequences, which can be in excess of 900 bp if determining subclass, becomes a bioinformatics conundrum, although there are now a large range of tools to facilitate this 75, 76, 77, 78. Paired end data can also be limited in ability to distinguish some somatic variants 79.…”
Section: Repertoire Analysis Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transferring these more in‐depth analyses to high throughput methods is dependent on the accuracy of sequence information, and there is a sense of reluctance in the field to take clear biological inferences from what may not be the most precise data. HTS methods that incorporate UMIs and that provide multiple reads of the same unique sequence may be able to provide data which would overcome this reluctance and it may even be possible to correct sequencing data without the aid of UIDs with the appropriate algorithm such as IgReC 78. In addition, there are computational methods available for the construction of lineage trees 115, 116.…”
Section: Clonality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%