Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation

Juthe, André

doi:10.1007/s10503-018-9467-9

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…• as presunções (Perelman;Olbrechts-Tyteca, 1996[1958), premissas de conexão (Juthe, 2019;van Eemeren, 2018), premissas doxais (Seixas, 2019), leis de passagem (Plantin, 2008) ou garantias (Toulmin, 2006(Toulmin, [1958), isto é, as proposições usualmente implícitas que representam o que é considerado como normal, dóxico ou pré-legitimado por um dado grupo de referência e funciona como um laço que une a(s) premissa(s) (materiais) à tese, atribuindo àquela(s) relevância para sustentar esta última -utilizaremos, a partir de agora, tanto o termo presunção quanto garantia para nos referirmos a este componente;…”

Section: Paulo Roberto Gonçalves-segundounclassified

“…Walton e Macagno (2015) e, por exemplo, denominam tanto os dados quanto a garantia toulminiana como premissa, apesar de reconhecerem haver uma distinção conceitual e funcional entre as premissas que atuam como dados e aquelas que atuam como garantia. Na Pragmadialética(Juthe, 2019;van Eemeren, 2018), diferencia-se entre a premissa material (equivalente ao dado) e a premissa de conexão (equivalente à garantia). A abordagem mais inovadora, nesse sentido, advém do Modelo Argumentum de Tópicas(Rigotti;Greco, 2019), que propõe que a estrutura de um argumento tenha cinco componentes: o endoxon, o dado, a primeira conclusão, a máxima, e a segunda conclusão (no fundo, a tese).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Afinal, o que é um argumento?

Gonçalves-Segundo

2024

Linha Água (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to discuss the concept of argument, a subject of considerable controversy in the field of argumentation studies. Our central objective is to provide a contribution to this debate through a unifying and integrative proposal guided by the following definition: an argument is a unit of support for an answer to an argumentative question. Building upon this definition, we proceed to expound on the properties of supporting, suggesting that it can be outlined through three operations: the logical-inferential operation of assigning plausibility to the thesis, which links the concept of argument to the notion of argument scheme in terms of an instance-type relationship; the rhetorical operation of generating influence, incorporating the discussion on commitments and agreements into the functioning of the argument; and the dialectical operation of shifting the burden of proof to the other, connecting rational to interactional and intertextual reality. Each of these operations is discussed from both theoretical and operational perspectives, highlighting relevant categories of analysis to address this complex set. In order to ground the discussion, we provide an illustrative analysis of a dialogue between a four-year-old child and her parent, published on Twitter (now X).

show abstract

Section: Paulo Roberto Gonçalves-segundounclassified

unclassified

Afinal, o que é um argumento?

Gonçalves-Segundo

2024

Linha Água (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

On the Logical Reconstruction of Conductive Arguments

Xie

2019

Argumentation Library

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Arguing in Direct Democracy: An Argument Scheme for Proposing Reasons in Debates Surrounding Public Votes

Müller

Campell

2023

Topoi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We develop a novel argument scheme tailored to debates surrounding public votes on a state action. It can be used to propose reasons for voting “yes” or “no” and allows for natural reconstructions of such debates. These reconstructions are of particular use to voters trying to weigh the pros and cons of the proposed state action. The scheme for proposing reasons helps answering two questions: What changes will the proposed state action bring with it? And are these changes good or not? Using the scheme, we derive a three-layered structure of public debates surrounding votes that aides in constructing systematic and comprehensive overviews. The scheme for proposing reasons also lends itself to concise summaries for voter information and can be incorporated into more general deliberation dialogues.

show abstract

Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation

Cited by 5 publications

References 37 publications

Afinal, o que é um argumento?

Afinal, o que é um argumento?

On the Logical Reconstruction of Conductive Arguments

Arguing in Direct Democracy: An Argument Scheme for Proposing Reasons in Debates Surrounding Public Votes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About