2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing genetic mating systems in the absence of parental information in colonially breeding waterbirds

Abstract: BackgroundDNA-based studies have demonstrated that avian genetic mating systems vary widely, with many species deviating from long-assumed monogamy by practicing extra-pair paternity and conspecific brood parasitism. Colonially breeding waterbirds provide interesting models in which to investigate this question because they show nesting habits proposed to promote alternative reproductive strategies. However, little is known about the genetic mating systems of this group of birds, mainly due to difficulties in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CBP has already been reported in other waterbirds, including some of the same family as the white‐faced ibis (listed by Yom‐Tov, ), and also in seabirds such as the wiskered tern (Paillisson et al, ). The few studies based on genetic data available for waterbirds also reported deviation from monogamy within broods in natural populations of the roseate spoonbill, the wood stork, and the great egret (Miño et al, ). In addition, genetic evidence supported the occurrence of CBP in other birds, such as the northern lapwing (Grønstøl et al, ), the black‐headed gull (Ležalová‐Piálková, ), and the black‐capped chickadee (Otter et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBP has already been reported in other waterbirds, including some of the same family as the white‐faced ibis (listed by Yom‐Tov, ), and also in seabirds such as the wiskered tern (Paillisson et al, ). The few studies based on genetic data available for waterbirds also reported deviation from monogamy within broods in natural populations of the roseate spoonbill, the wood stork, and the great egret (Miño et al, ). In addition, genetic evidence supported the occurrence of CBP in other birds, such as the northern lapwing (Grønstøl et al, ), the black‐headed gull (Ležalová‐Piálková, ), and the black‐capped chickadee (Otter et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBP has recently been studied using molecular techniques, which allowed researchers to more profoundly explore the role of kin selection in the evolution of this behavior (see references in Eadie and Lyon, ). Colonial waterbirds represent an especially interesting group in which to study reproductive behavior (Miño et al, ) because nesting in colonies is one of the breeding habits proposed to promote CBP (Brown, ; Møller and Birkhead, ; Lyon and Everding, ; Brown and Lawes, ). Although the literature on mating systems in colonially breeding waterbirds is still notably scarce (Miño and Del Lama, ), the few genetic studies available on this group have proposed that both EPP and CBP can occur in natural populations (e.g., Lyon and Everding, ; Miño et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First the program ML-Relate 56 was used to determine the most likely relationship between nestling pairs using a maximum likelihood approach. Then the hypothesis testing tool, based on simulations, was used to determine statistically significant relationships between pairs in a manner similar to that used in Miño et al 19. (see Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic methods allow us to overcome the potential shortcomings of purely observational studies when determining a given species’ mating system81314. Despite the wide-spread occurrence of social monogamy across avian species, recent research has found strict genetic monogamy to be the exception rather than the rule (e.g 2356789151617181920…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1The study by Miño et al (2011) refers to nine microsatellite loci, whereas that by Van Den Bussche et al (1999) refers to four loci, also mentioned in Eo et al (2010).2Original reference: McGuire and Noor (2002).3Original references: Goostrey et al (1998) and Piertney et al (1998).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%