2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53153-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing Geography, Power and Politics in the Belt and Road Initiative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…International trade has negatively impacted the environment since more energy is being consumed and fossil fuels are being burned [ 18 ]. [ 19 ] found that the relationship between CO 2 emissions, international trade, and the byproducts of fossil fuels is not a straight line [ 20 ]. claim that China's energy usage increased due to globalization, and international trade's impact on byproducts of fossil fuels varies throughout time and place [ 21 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International trade has negatively impacted the environment since more energy is being consumed and fossil fuels are being burned [ 18 ]. [ 19 ] found that the relationship between CO 2 emissions, international trade, and the byproducts of fossil fuels is not a straight line [ 20 ]. claim that China's energy usage increased due to globalization, and international trade's impact on byproducts of fossil fuels varies throughout time and place [ 21 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2021) found that China's energy consumption increased due to the expansion of the international trade scale. Shi et al (2020) focused on countries from the Belt and Road region using a threshold model and discovered a nonlinear relation between international trade and carbon emissions. discovered that the ratio of embodied carbon per unit value-added exports to embodied carbon per unit value-added imports is much lower in developed countries than in developing countries, indicating that developed countries have obtained higher trade benefits at relatively low environmental costs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%