2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing maps from text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings lend further support to semantic memory search being a two stages process (see refs. 47,65,66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings lend further support to semantic memory search being a two stages process (see refs. 47,65,66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although alternative views exist (e.g., refs. 47,65,66 ), the framework of exploration and exploitation in semantic foraging offers a useful quantitative method to characterize the responses in diverse generation tasks relevant to creativity. For instance, a few studies have separated exploitation/exploration processes operationalized in a visuospatial creativity task 67 or clustering and switching behavior in a divergent thinking task [68][69][70] , suggesting that they reflect separable processes supporting creative ideation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is substantiated by a growing body of research emphasizing the crucial interplay between perceptual and linguistic experiences in the formation of cognitive maps. In particular, 4 studies exploiting distributional semantic models (DSMs) demonstrated that spatial information can be bootstrapped from the statistical structure of natural language (Avery et al, 2021;Gatti et al, 2022;Louwerse, 2018;Rinaldi & Marelli, 2020). For instance, by exploiting Latent Semantic Analysis (Landauer & Dumais, 1997), a traditional count-based DSMs whose first processing step builds on the computation of word co-occurrences, Louwerse and colleagues showed that it is possible to reconstruct the spatial layout (e.g., geographical distance between cities) of geographical maps from various real world regions using text corpora written in the corresponding languages (e.g., using American corpora to reproduce the maps of the USA; Louwerse & Zwaan, 2009;Louwerse et al, 2006;Louwerse et al, 2012), as well as fictional words such as the Middle Earth from J. R. R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandera et al (2017) showed that word embeddings can be used to predict semantic priming as well as word associations, similarity/relatedness ratings and even perform well in a multiple-choice task. Further evidence in favour of the cognitive plausibility of word embeddings has been provided by Westbury (2014); Westbury and Hollis (2019) who predicted familiarity and humour ratings respectively, Abdou et al (2021) who showed that even color relations are accurately represented by purely textual embeddings, as well as Louwerse and Zwaan (2009); Avery et al (2021) who demonstrated that geographical locations of cities are reflected in purely textual embeddings. However, the cognitive plausibility of mechanisms generating word embeddings such as Word2Vec has not gone unchallenged (Mannering and Jones, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%