1993
DOI: 10.1090/advsov/016.2/03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing monoidal categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
114
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
114
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately a classification for fusion categories of Lie types E N , F 4 or G 2 (in the spirit of the type A − D classifications, see [8,16]) does not exist, making such a strengthening problematic (at least from our approach). (2) It is desirable to have more conceptual explanation of Theorems 3.4, 3.6 and 3.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately a classification for fusion categories of Lie types E N , F 4 or G 2 (in the spirit of the type A − D classifications, see [8,16]) does not exist, making such a strengthening problematic (at least from our approach). (2) It is desirable to have more conceptual explanation of Theorems 3.4, 3.6 and 3.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q > 0 is the usual deformation parameter, and where τ = ±1 is the twist, constructed by Kazhdan and Wenzl in [12]. In particular the value µ = −1 corresponds to the values q = 1 and τ = −1.…”
Section: Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A block system of algebra is called a monoidal algebra according to Kazhdan and Wenzl [4] (though they use this terminology in a more restricted meaning) if it is furnished with the operation of taking tensor products which satisfies the above conditions.…”
Section: Monoidal Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%