2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the build-up of a pelagic stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) population using hydroacoustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were historically no larval predators in the pelagic zone. Since the end of 2012 however, a massive invasion by three‐spined stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) of the pelagic zone of the lake (Eckmann and Engesser ) has created very significant predation pressure on whitefish (Rösch et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were historically no larval predators in the pelagic zone. Since the end of 2012 however, a massive invasion by three‐spined stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) of the pelagic zone of the lake (Eckmann and Engesser ) has created very significant predation pressure on whitefish (Rösch et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A later study (Rey and Becker, 2017) documented an increase in the proportion of cormorant stomachs containing stickleback in comparison to the previous survey, with 39% of individuals hunted in the spring of 2016 containing G. aculeatus. Thus, it is possible that these abundant prey items in the pelagic zone (Eckmann and Engesser, 2018) are particularly beneficial when other species of dietary importance, such as Perca fluviatilis, move to deeper water to overwinter (Wang and Eckmann, 1994;Eckmann and Imbrock, 1996). Many other avian species in the region such as grebes, herons, mergansers, kingfishers, gulls, and terns are known to consume threespine stickleback (Foster and Bell, 1994;Werner et al, 2018), so we may observe an increase in their abundance, or changes in migration patterns as well in response to increased pelagic stickleback densities in the future.…”
Section: Examining the Lake Constance Stickleback Population From A Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 species, of which three are common in the pelagic zone: the native lake char (Salvelinus umbla), the whitefish and the stickleback. The latter is an invasive, non-native species that has been occurring at high densities in the pelagic zone of Upper Lake Constance since 2012 -2013 (Rösch et al 2018;Eckmann & Engesser 2019), and in 2014 represented 96 % of the total abundance and 28 % of the biomass of pelagic fish (Alexander & Vonlanthen 2016).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%